Maybe not that interesting for everyone here, but I found no better community for this.

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 days ago

    And of course, the video was preempted by an AI slop ad of a talking monkey wearing a neck brace.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      Use Firefox + uBlock Origin on desktop and on mobile. Only watch YouTube via Firefox. Never see these bullshit ads again.

      Currently adblocking is winning the war of the technical evolution of control vs. resistance.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    Honestly, it isn’t the AI so much as it is the suspension that rules that apply to us should also apply to AI. They are barely legal companies getting away with murder due to the residual power of a corrupt empire in decline.

    • TeddE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Much the same as blockchain - it could have been exciting and fun, but it was immediately put to work to exploit people, and in the end that’s what the tools effectively were.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        I don’t think blockchain has any legitimate uses. All of the proposed uses for blockchain are all tech bro nonsense.

        I think they were talking about having a decentralised property permits. As if that’s something that would be even remotely useful.

        • mistermodal@lemmy.mlBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          You’d be surprised how valuable these technologies can be when they’re not only being developed to create new financialized services to overcharge people for. Manufacturing and shipping has huge capital and logistic buffers created by information gaps, production shortfalls, fraud, etcetera, and cryptographic ledgers are excellent for ensuring accurate production and inventory information is relayed to clients in realtime. What’s more, it has the potential to mediate international transactions without relying on Swift or global banking institutions that are an extension of US authority.

          Notice how nothing I said was about fucking NFTs. The western financial system completely lost the plot doing super cocaine and became convinced they could just ask the rest of the world to stay slaves forever. They don’t even care about its potential! They want TrumpCoin.

  • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Their quality going down is probably what’s killing their channel. Every video is a merch ad, and the occasional shilling for the fossil fuel industry probably doesn’t help any.

    These things are to be expected when you get bought by private equity, but let’s not be dishonest and say it’s all AI slop that’s killing them.

      • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        They accepted, and continue to accept a great amount of money from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. That foundation owns over $11 billion in investments in the fossil fuel industry, including coal-burning utility companies.

        In return, there were quite a few videos that Kurzgesagt admits were funded directly by the Foundation, that exaggerate the positive influence corporations owned by the foundation have had. Videos which the CEO of Kurzgesagt has admitted they probably would not have made if the Foundation had not paid for them.

        • blakemiller@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          That’s really embarrassing that we as a community have chosen, of all possible creators, to deride Kurzgesagt for taking money from The Gates Foundation. It’s 0.05% of their holdings. ZERO POINT ZERO FIVE. Which, by the way, is down from 6% in the past after public concern — yes, a whopping 6%. Scourge of the earth, locked out of heaven: The Gates Foundation. Those computer nerds strike again. And we choose to punish a great content contributor for that. Shameful display of purity politics.

          • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            Yeah. It seems like a ridiculous accusation to make. Bro couldn’t even answer the question about example of shilling so they had to pivot into the crime of taking money from a foundation to produce high quality educational content.

            How dare they?

            • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 days ago

              They accepted, and continue to accept a great amount of money from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. That foundation owns over $11 billion in investments in the fossil fuel industry, including coal-burning utility companies.

              In return, there were quite a few videos that Kurzgesagt admits were funded directly by the Foundation, that exaggerate the positive influence corporations owned by the foundation have had. Videos which the CEO of Kurzgesagt has admitted they probably would not have made if the Foundation had not paid for them.

              question answered. if you don’t want to accept the CEO of Kurzgesagt word that they would not have made the videos if they hadn’t been paid to, then that isn’t my problem. I’m not here to convince you, and I don’t mind if you don’t believe him.

              • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                14 days ago

                I did a few searches and while I didn’t find that quote from Kurzgesagt’s CEO, I did find the contribution listed from a decade ago on the Gates foundation website. $570,000 paid out over four years. They also gave NPR $2,000,000 the next year.

                Since I didn’t find the CEOs quote you’ve mentioned, I can only question the context around it. Would those videos not have been made because the Gates foundation specifically tied the funding to those videos being created? Or would they not have been made because Kurzgesagt didn’t have the money to do so otherwise?

                Regardless, Kurzgesagt is a private company and if they wanted to conceal hidden agendas by corporate contributors, they would just keep quiet - not openly acknowledge that they made content with money given to them by some larger organisation.

                If we’re going to denounce any group of people that are connected via Bacon’s Law to a disastrous corporate industry, the moral high ground will be unachievable for the entirety of our species.

                • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  The Hated One did a video some years ago on the matter, if you’re curious then search it up because they list all their sources for everything including the quote from the CEO.

          • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            The problem is when the contributors influence what the videos say, in contradiction to data.

            Kurzgesagt’s video on +2° / +3° / +4° over the global mean isn’t going to be so bad video was conspicuous to me, and is in fact, based on fossil-fuel industry rhetoric, rather than climatology estimations (which tell us over +1.5° is going to fuck us, and is).

        • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          They accepted, and continue to accept a great amount of money from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

          It’s interesting how any false narrative starts with a granule of truth.

          Kurzgesagt was indeed provided $570,000 in 2015. That money was paid out across the following four years.

          They have not continued to accept any amount of money from the Gates foundation.

    • obazdaa@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      I just looked at the public company records and they are not owned by private equity. What are you talking about?

      • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        First off, no you didn’t.

        Secondly, if you take money from billionaires to make propaganda videos for them, then you’re owned by them. You sell your soul to the devil, you can’t undo it later because you get called out for it.

      • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        They are owned by private equity? It’s pretty common these days for the more popular YT channels. Veritasium, Astrum, Fireship, fern., and Hoog are some other examples. Basically, if it’s a popular YT channel, it’s either owned by PE, in negotiations to be acquired by PE, or pursued by a PE firm in the hopes that they can acquire it. Private equity is accelerating their acquisitions, actually, and they want to control everything that captures the attention of viewers.

        Here’s a video that talks about it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJ-rRXWhElI

        • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          No wonder veritasium has felt “off” for me for a good while as well. A few years ago I deliberately stopped watching that channel, seems there was a deeper reason behind my superficial reasons and gut feelings

          • socsa@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            He basically only makes “why everyone except me is wrong about X” content now, and it’s super smug and obnoxious.

            • Iceman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              They seem to use the “shotgun” future in Youtube for titles and Thumbnails. Having the a bunch of different titles and and thumbnails and eventually sticking with the combo that drives the most engagement.

          • minimum@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            The content is higher-quality, more like a TV production. But it’s still pretty solid. Good analogies and intuitive explanations.

        • RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          There’s an incredible amount of money in those offers. Years ago Linus Tech Tips got an offer of 100m, so I get why people take the money.

          • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            15 days ago

            I mean, I would probably sell the channel myself. That’s a lifechanging amount of money. I would buy some land deep in the backcountry, build a little walled village, and invite my family and friends to come live there. Grow our own food, set up some solar panels and wind turbines, buy up plenty of guns and ammo, and see if we couldn’t hunker down and live out the ever more likely downfall of the American economy in relative peace.

              • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                14 days ago

                if you wanna just have boards with rusty nails and maybe a baseball bat for defense when trump takes the mask completely off and his raving followers form pogroms to round up people who aren’t loyal to him, then I will say something nice in your memory when the time comes.

            • FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              14 days ago

              So basically you would turn yourself in a mini-me version of Zuckenberg, Musk and Bezos. Given this consideration I would reassess my life priorities if I were you

              • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                14 days ago

                the priority would be the lives of my friends and family. that is a priority that will not change as long as I draw breath, no matter what anyone thinks.

                • FabioTheNewOrder@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  Well, if the societal structure falls there won’t be anything left to provide for your friends and family and you’ll be left to eat each other in your compound as will the billionaires using their fortunes to build survival bunkers. If that’s the way you wanna go, with the leg of your mother as dinner, be my guest. If you, on the other hand, want to have a positive impact on the whole process helping stop this social decline there are much better ways to use your hypothetical money. It’s up to you to decide, greed over cooperation or the other way around?

        • hikaru755@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          Do you have actual evidence for Kurzgesagt being among PE-owned channels, or are you just extrapolating? Because the video you linked doesn’t mention them, and a quick search didn’t turn up anything about that.

          • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            14 days ago

            if most of your money comes from billionaires and you admit to making propaganda videos for them, you’re owned by private equity. it doesn’t matter how much you or they argue about how that isn’t technically true because it’s not officially on paper.

            • hikaru755@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              14 days ago

              Like it or not, words have meaning, and black and white thinking is comfortable, but doesn’t help anyone. There is still a massive difference between the gates foundation having a 0.5% stake in Kurzgesagt and them being “owned” by PE, and pretending otherwise just means you’re not actually interested in any kind of productive discussion.

              • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                14 days ago

                When you sell your soul to the devil, it’s gone forever. And I never implied I was interested in “productive discussion”. I said what I said because I’ve seen what evidence there is and have made my own conclusions. I never said I was interested in debating.

  • Auth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    I dont think its AI Slop thats “killing the channel” if that statement is even remotely true its due to more and more of their videos being slop sci low information videos. The target audience must be stoners who want to watch something that is visually appealing and feels educational

  • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    I want an ad / DNS blocklist for AI slop. I want to not even be able to go to HiSToRiAn AsLeEp In ThE WoOdS channels on my networks and devices

  • Davy Jones@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    This whole video felt like an advertisement to me. I’d already seen it twice, was it necessary to crosspost it again? You could at least have waited a couple of weeks before reposting the same content.

  • Eh-I@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    I have noticed that I don’t click on their videos as fast. Used to be that as soon as you see a video in the feed it was an instant click.

      • a_postmodern_hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        100%. The recent videos all seem like they’re ragebait (‘alcohol is awesome’ springs to mind).

        They could be good, I haven’t watched them. if they’re targeting people who respond to that tone then it’s not for me.

        It’s a shame. I liked the earlier videos on ant colonies and strange matter and stars and stuff.