• Bgugi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    For clarity: this is based on piaac test results. The literacy test results are sorted into 6 categories (1-5 and <1) for comparing the distribution internationally. 54% of Americans score less than 3, compared to top-scoring Japan and top-english-speaking Australia at approximately 35% and 45%. The task description for level 3:

    Adults at Level 3 are able to construct meaning across larger chunks of text or perform multi-step operations in order to identify and formulate responses. They can identify, interpret or evaluate one or more pieces of information, often employing varying levels of inferencing. They can combine various processes (accessing, understanding and evaluating) if required by the task . Adults at this level can compare and evaluate multiple pieces of information from the text(s) based on their relevance or credibility. Texts at this level are often dense or lengthy, including continuous, noncontinuous, mixed. Information may be distributed across multiple pages, sometimes arising from multiple sources that provide discrepant information. Understanding rhetorical structures and text signals becomes more central to successfully completing tasks, especially when dealing with complex digital texts that require navigation. The texts may include specific, possibly unfamiliar vocabulary and argumentative structures. Competing information is often present and sometimes salient, though no more than the target information. Tasks require the respondent to identify, interpret, or evaluate one or more pieces of information, and often require varying levels of inferencing. Tasks at Level 3 also often demand that the respondent disregard irrelevant or inappropriate text content to answer accurately. The most complex tasks at this level include lengthy or complex questions requiring the identification of multiple criteria, without clear guidance regarding what has to be done

    I could not find which source originally cited level 2 as “6th grade” equivalent, though the oecd recommends against drawing that parallel.

    • joel_feila@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Hmmm so back in 6th grade when i would read the questions on the test and fond the answer to ome question in a different question on a different page was that level 3 reading?

  • scala@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    To make it worse year by year the republicans continue to defund education, remove sciences, sex education and history from being taught in schools. While trying to force christian religion in public schools.

    What a timeline America is going through.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    Well, reading and writing is a 6 millenia old technology, thus it’s in dire need of replacement with AI readers /s

  • conicalscientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    The podcast called Sold a Story talks about how the school systems adopted a curriculum that doesn’t teach kids how to read. They are more like mimicking literacy. It gives appearances they they are reading but they aren’t comprehending.

  • m3t00🌎@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    knew an old man who couldn’t read. he could write phone numbers in a notebook and remembered who it was by where it was written. no names. Fort Worth 1980.

  • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yeah, we’ve noticed. Not that Europe is far behind I fear.

    Literacy is definitely declining; people just don’t have the attention spans they used to. Between Twitter, TikTok and other brain rot, reading a book or simply a longer text just isn’t something a lot of people do.

  • RedFrank24@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    I dare not find out what my reading level is, for the same reason I dare not find out what my IQ is. I don’t gain anything by knowing it, and knowing that I’m stupid will only worsen my self-esteem issues.

    I feel better assuming I’m roughly average for both measurements.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Here is the thing… You can work on both of those. Literacy is not capped by your intelligence, unless you are exceptionally challenged, like mentally unfit to live by yourself challenged. You can read more books, and journal articles, and expand your reading ability.

      IQ is mostly bullshit. The test can help identify if you have a disability, but it’s relatively worthless for determining how intelligent you can actually be. You can practice pattern recognition and then take an IQ test, but all that means is that you are good at recognizing patterns. There are plenty of “High IQ” people who can’t figure out basic shit, like how to put on a spare tire.

      So don’t feel bad if you don’t score well on those tests. They only measure how you did one time on one test.

    • zqrm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      It means you can read and understand the instructions on a pack of ramen but can’t pick up on nuances, infer bias or apply any kind of abstract reasoning to a piece of text