I watched the long walk and now I’m reading the book. I was wondering, how credible is the distance? It’s 300 to 400 miles. What would happen to your body on the way?

  • SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    There was a pilrimage/challenge a friend of mine went on. It was walking 20 miles each day for 3 days for a total of 60 mi/96.5 km. That was in upstate NY where there are plenty of hills to keep it interesting

    Blisters, chafing and fatigue is common but many people do that every year

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    The Appalachian Trail is about 2000 miles and a lot if people walk that. Worth a Google search. There are documentaries, memoirs, plenty of before/after photos, etc.

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      They mean without stopping.

      If you’re unfamiliar with the Long Walk, it’s a story where a bunch of kids are in a contest to see who can walk the longest. If you stop walking, you get shot.

      • feannag@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        Ooohh. I definitely read that first as The Long Walk about Slawomir Rawicz’s escape from the gulag to India.

  • Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    Ultra-marathon runners will typically run/jog for over 100 miles without stopping (except for a piss), and the hard-core ones will just piss themselves anyway.

    With decent footwear and training the only thing stopping you from walking will be your need for sleep which will come at the 48-36 hour mark. But even then I suppose the desire to not be shot will keep you going further.

    At an average walking pace of 4mph, you can walk 300 miles in just over 3 days without stopping

  • solrize@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    I watched the long walk and now I’m reading the book. I was wondering, how credible is the distance? It’s 300 to 400 miles. What would happen to your body on the way?

    I don’t know what happens in the long walk, but if you mean nonstop, 300-400 miles isn’t happening unless maybe as a death march. OTOH for someone who is in shape, 300-400 miles with stops for sleep and provisions is certainly doable. The Appalachian Trail is 2200 miles and lots of people through-hike it. It typically takes 5 to 7 months though some do it faster. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appalachian_Trail

    Oh man, the long walk sounds nuts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Long_Walk_(novel)

    Sleep deprivation, no pooping, etc. Yeah, I found Stephen King to be a horrible writer and never understood his appeal.

    • einkorn@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      300-400 miles isn’t happening unless maybe as a death march.

      He-he, I guess you typed that before reading the wiki page.

    • adhocfungus@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      I haven’t seen the movie, but the book is very detailed about how the death march is tearing apart their bodies and minds. Some basically sleepwalk and get the tiniest fraction of rest. But even those that do are driven insane.

      I’m not really a fan of most of King’s work, but The Long Walk is worth a read even if you don’t like his other stuff.

      • solrize@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        27 days ago

        My main dislike about the few King works that I read was that the characters got put into horror-like situations and then had no freedom of action. This sounds like another one of those. I guess I’ll make a note of its existence in case I find it on a park bench someday, but I don’t feel likely to go looking for it. Thanks.

    • Professorozone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      I think he’s a great writer that frequently drops the ball with the ending and has a few big flops.

      However, he wrote the Green Mile and the Shawshank Redemption, which are awesome. He also wrote Thinner, which I quite liked. I recently read, I have to remember the date 11-23-69 I think it was. That was pretty good. I think many people liked the Shining. I personally never saw or read it though. So personally I have mixed feelings.

  • toddestan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    If you use the book’s pace of 4 MPH, which is actually what many people would consider a brisk walk, 300-400 miles would take 75-100 hours, or around 3-4 days. That’s a long time to stay up without sleeping, let alone being physically active the entire time. I’d guess someone who is really fit might be able to do half of that before collapsing, with most people probably not making past the first 24 hours.

    Someone who was using drugs or doping might be able to do it, but even then I’d be skeptical.

  • IWW4@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    It is unknown what the the max distance is. Terry fox ran a marathon every day over the course of 140+ days and ran around 3500 miles …… and he was missing a leg when he did it.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    Without rest? I don’t know. I could walk a marathon distance with the right shoes but would need to stop to pee. Two marathons? Probably not without training some months, and where would I find the time? Also, if it was in the day here, risk of heat exhaustion is pretty high at midday & afternoon.

    300 miles? No.

    • Trail@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      Assuming male, because it’s the internet afterall, you don’t need to stop walking to pee. Just saying.