While those are definitely the undertones, I’m 99.9% sure that Jerry Seinfeld never thought that far. He just came up with a plot about bees.
And this dichotomy makes it a real piece of art.
While those are definitely the undertones, I’m 99.9% sure that Jerry Seinfeld never thought that far. He just came up with a plot about bees.
And this dichotomy makes it a real piece of art.
If he pulls the lever so the trolley starts to multi-track drift, he can kill all 10 people at once
Though naming it by the following year instead of the release year is clearly a marketing move.
Sorry, but that’s absolutely wrong - the complexity of articles can vary wildly. Many are easily understandable, while many others are not understandable without a lot of prerequisite knowledge in the domain (e.g. mathematics stuff).
If the reader is interested in the content, they aren’t going to skip it.
But they aren’t interested in the content because of the complexity. You may wish that humans work like you describe, but we literally see that they don’t.
What you can do is provide a simplified summary to make people interested, so they’re willing to engage with the more complex language to get deeper knowledge around the topic.
For example, look at all the iPad kids who can’t use a computer for shit. Kids who grew up with computers HAD to learn the more complex interface of computers to be able to do the cool things they wanted to do on the computer.
You’re underestimating how many people before the iPad generation also can’t use computers because they never developed an interest to engage with the complexity.
[…] then how are those readers going to improve their poor reading skills?
By becoming interested in improving their poor reading skills. You won’t make people become interested in that by having everything available only in complex language, it’s just going to make them skip over your content. Otherwise there shouldn’t be people with poor reading skills, since complex language is already everywhere in life.
What’s there to understand? They are simply superb!
Super. Hexagon.
It’s hard to explain the relief I felt upon beating the last level. I can fairly easily survive for 300s in the first one, but I’ve never gotten close to beating the last one again.
The most important tip I can give: if you have a 60Hz monitor, turn off VSync. Makes a huge difference.
There’s also a “spiritual successor” called Open Hexagon that’s extendable by the community if you want more, though I haven’t played it myself.
Replace your potted plants with catnip.
. . . , . … . . , … . . . .
By the way, the previous Pope died literally hours after I watched Conclave.
So if you don’t like the new one just tell me, I wouldn’t mind a rewatch.
Very understandable! I’ve also stopped drinking beer, because it never started tasting good.
Cooper always tries to walk it in.
Coffee is the same for me. Beer used to be the same, but I got used to it - still doesn’t taste great, but cold it’s acceptable. But not coffee, I never got used to it.
Yes, the first example does the same thing, but there’s still less to mentally parse. Ideally you should just use if len(mylist) == 0:
.
This is honestly the worst version regarding readability. Don’t rely on implicit coercion, people.
Nintendo is a shitty company and companies in general do shitty anti consumer things, but passing along tariff costs isn’t one of these.
The sky color is part of the training data. How did the LLMs include the training data before it existed?
What’s the deal with bees? They work like busy bees and produce honey for us, but we don’t pay them anything. It’s the bees knees! But what if they stopped working for free?
And what’s the deal with airplane bees?