• Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    These guys spend a billion dollars every couple years to invent the lock screen again

    • Glitchvid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      26 days ago

      Also not a fan of the critical UI elements being popped out into floating islands, very easy to accidentally hit underlying page content when there’s effectively zero padding around controls (on touch devices, as the ad companies have discovered by making the × icons smaller and smaller).

    • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      Wow, that is bad. The music one is probably the worst of the examples. The artist name is barely readable most of that clip.

      The notifications are rough too, a big wall of white text against a burry multicolor background is not fun to read.

  • 3aqn5k6ryk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    26 days ago

    jfc. that is one ugly looking ui. really scraping bottom of the barrel. that is soo last years.

  • sbird [moved to sopuli]@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    25 days ago

    Using the developer beta and my phone runs quite hot. Of course, it’s a beta so they’ll probably reduce the effects to make it less of drain on performance and battery life. There is a reduce transparency toggle which does help a bit, esp. for readability. Hopefully when iOS 26 is released there’s an obvious option to reduce transparency.

    My opinion on the “liquid glass” is mixed. Some parts look pretty cool. The apps (Mail, Photos, etc.) use it quite well, with only some parts are transparent making readability a bit better. I really like the change to the search bars being at the bottom, makes the phone more one-handable. Safari doesn’t look too good in my opinion, the glass effects are a bit much. The camera app just hid all the buttons, which is a bit annoying. You can have it show flash and live photos toggles in settings, which is good.

    The lock screen effect with the “3d” photos is very cool, but the phone runs extra hot when it’s enabled so I turned that off. The glassy clock is pretty cool and there’s the option to make it normal again if you select “solid”. Swiping up from the lock screen makes a weird glass effect with the edges distorted and lots of rainbow fringing, which looks a bit odd. When you swipe down you can see the home screen app icons until it’s all the way down, then they all pop out of existence and the background is replaced. Bit jarring. Similar effect with swiping up, background changes with no transition, but the apps appear in an animation this time. Weird. I’m assuming this is probably a bug with the beta, at least I hope it is…

    Onto the home screen. I think the “liquid glass” themes make the tinted icons look a bit better than just colour on black, I like that bit of customisability. I still do not get the “clear” icons, it quite literally is transparent and you can barely differentiate the icons. You can always swap it to the default, but there is still some annoying glass effects on app icons where it clearly isn’t natively built (I’m guessing the glass effects is applied to all icons automatically incl. third party apps, but it doesn’t look too great with some of them). The app folders look terrible though and the reflection/refraction is really distracting. The pop ups when you select text is especially annoying, popping up a huge bubble. I’ll need some time to get used to that vs just clicking right to share, translate, etc. The control center is not very nice to look at but it works fine.

    Overall, in places where it’s used tastefully (in a lot of Apple’s apps, for instance) it works quite well if a bit distracting. I like the lock screen and home screen customisation and the ability to change it to “solid”. The glass effects are still quite distracting though. The reduce transparency toggle does help a bit with readability, but it’s annoying that it’s buried deep in accessibility settings. Not very accessible at all. The lock screen 3d effect is cool but is a bit subtle, and it makes the phone uncomfortably hot. There are still plenty of bugs, but that’ll hopefully be fixed in the public release. I like the option for the tinted icons but do not get the clear icons. Camera app isn’t too functional, just hiding everything isn’t better than before! The iOS 26 beta is quite fun, if very buggy, and the liquid glass works in some places but doesn’t work in all places.

    • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      Lol

      I use both every day. Pixel 9 Pro XL (personal) and an iPhone 12 (work). Plus my own M1 iPad Pro.

      They’re not even fucking close.

  • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    The announcement also marks a change in how Apple signifies its major updates to iOS. Under the previous marketing scheme, this year’s major release would have been iOS 19 — the direct follow-up to iOS 18. But now, Apple’s big iOS updates will be numbered based on the year following their introduction

    Well that’s interesting. I was certain The Verge was trying to be funny. But this tracks, now Apple has Biggest Number™.

    Edit: This has to be a joke. Who the fuck thought this up? I can’t take this seriously…

    • MimicJar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      It’s not a matter of biggest number, it’s a matter of consistency.

      They have five operating systems, macOS, iOS, iPadOS, watchOS, visionOS.

      So currently we have macOS 15, iOS 18, iPadOS 18, watchOS 11 & visionOS 2. That’s absolute confusion. Do I have the latest version? Dropping support for an older version, how many years ago was that?

      A version number should convey useful information, and the year it was released is useful information. Especially when major updates come every year.

      Edit: I forgot tvOS, also version 18. So six operating systems.

      • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        It’s not a matter of biggest number, it’s a matter of consistency.

        They have five operating systems, macOS, iOS, iPadOS, watchOS, visionOS.

        So currently we have macOS 15, iOS 18, iPadOS 18, watchOS 11 & visionOS 2. That’s absolute confusion. Do I have the latest version? Dropping support for an older version, how many years ago was that?

        I don’t disagree with you on principle, but I still think the implementation is fucking bonkers.

        A version number should convey useful information, and the year it was released is useful information. Especially when major updates come every year.

        Major updates should come when they’re needed, not on a set schedule. CVEs don’t wait. Yes, I know patches and security updates are a thing. I still think it’s ridiculous. And I absolutely blame Apple for setting the “new thing every year” trend in motion.

        • MimicJar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          How would you prefer they handle it?

          Just to look at macOS version history,

          The first public release was “Mac OS X 10.0”, this continued until “Mac OS X 10.7 Lion”. The “big cat” became part of the marketing name because the OS & version were a mouthful and throwing numbers around wasn’t helpful.

          We drop the “Mac” next year, then switch to mountains, but it’s not long before we reach, “OS X 10.10” aka “OS ten ten ten”.

          Well it wasn’t long before we simplified further and just said “macOS”, but then took a while before we dropped the “10”. Now we just get “macOS 15 Sequoia”.

          For nearly 18 years the Mac operating system had an unnecessary “10” that conveyed zero information.

          • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            26 days ago

            Just to look at macOS version history,

            Yeah, I remember when Mac OS X came out. It was a pretty significant improvement from Mac OS 9 (I grew up on System 7/Mac OS 8, dicked around a bit with 9). Unfortunately, they beat that horse until it lost all meaning, and then dragged the corpse until there was nothing left. It was ridiculous 10 years in (looking at you, Microsoft), and was borderline meme status when they finally dropped the OSX branding altogether.

            How would you prefer they handle it?

            They were doing fine once they dropped “10”. Major version updates have a major version number. It was fixed. Done. Why fix what isn’t broken? Just because the version numbers of your various operating systems don’t match, doesn’t mean it’s “broken”. They’re different operating systems. Versioning has lost all meaning at this point. Shit, even Windows 11 still uses NT kernel 10. And before NT Kernel 10? It was 6.3.

            What the fuck even is proper versioning anymore.

            I’m just ranting into the void now.

            • MimicJar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              26 days ago

              See but I would argue that five different version numbers across five different operating systems is broken. (Ok two of them do match up.)

              Specifically the watchOS version is the important one that stands out. watchOS version 1 works with which version of macOS? Which version of iOS or iPadOS?

              Also when it comes time to end support for devices, how do you keep track? If Apple provides 5 years of updates, do you know if your phone is still supported?

              If my phone is running iOS 14, is that supported? Is that new? Is that old?

              The key thing to keep in mind is that the entirety of this ecosystem is based on yearly releases.


              Just for “fun” let’s look at Windows. The current version is 11. It was released in 2021. So I guess as long as I have Windows 11, I am up to date. But… That’s not true. Windows 11 does have a version number that’s not directly end user facing. That version is 24H2.

              Now the “24” is the year, that’s useful. Now what’s stupid is the “H2”. Because sitting here in June 2025 I would expect “25H1” to be released anytime now. But Microsoft only used the H1 once, about five years ago. Now “Window 11 version 24H2” is better SEO vs “Window 11 version 24”, so maybe that’s why they kept it.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      it’s not that unusual, lots of software is named by the date. i think it makes a lot of sense especailly for apple, now they don’t have a different release number for all their different platforms.