• dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    15 days ago

    My dad lived a healthy lifestyle. Worked out everyday except the weekends; even competed in amateur competitions. He followed all the scientist’s advice and ate what was healthy and stayed away from what wasn’t. Still got Stage 4 cancer and died before his 69th birthday.

    Point is: we’re still going to die, no matter how healthy we are. If you want to drink, do it responsibly (don’t drive, or text). Enjoy as much of this shitty life as you can, while you can.

      • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        I’ve seen it said that your date of death (if natural) is somewhat set in stone by genetics, but the condition you’ll spend your final years in will be the result of your lifestyle instead. So living to excess will fuck you up in your later years but won’t necessarily kill you any sooner.

        • garretble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          15 days ago

          Oh no. My grandmother is 92 and my grandfather is 93 and my great grandfather passed at 102.

          I don’t know if I want to live that far. I better start drinkin’.

        • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          15 days ago

          20-30% of lifespan is based on genetics and 20-30% of health in later years as well. The rest is all lifestyle.

          This is controlling for external elements like accidents or disasters.

          So somewhat genetics is true but it can be overcome with lifestyle to some degree. Figuring out which lifestyle choices is tricky and one of those times where sciences’ replication crisis makes it all muddled.

          Advancement in medicine also plays a role because it can reign in some poor lifestyle choices that were death spirals just a generation prior.

    • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Yep, as the saying goes, living will kill you.

      My approach is moderation. Enjoy life, enjoy those guilty pleasures, but, do it in moderation.

    • GingaNinga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 days ago

      Ya everything is probability and risk factors, nothing is certain. Life is for living, might as well have a good time (within reason/with moderation of course).

    • Lucky_777@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      Cancer is a bitch because even if we cured everything but cancer…we would still get cancer eventually. Cancer comes for even the immortal. Without that cure, we all would eventually get Cancer.

    • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      14 days ago

      No shit sherlock. Everyone has a different tolerance, sensitivity and trigger points for all kind of problems to appear out of nowhere. But this advice is bullshit.

      Having hard facts and learning how it affects the body goes further than “enjoy life, my granny smoked till she was 100 years old, I should be fine with 1 cigarette a day” kind of thinking.

      If you ever have any accident by accident, your chances of survival or recovery is diminished for your use of harmful substances. Everything is perfect until it isn’t.You’re supposed to use science as a basis of making things more manageable when dealing with uncertainty. But, you’ll then blame the doctors, saying how you had no any other problems with you and how healthy you were.

      You’re the kind of people in hospitals who say “I’ve never had a pill in my life and all these doctors are crazy psychopaths that say crazy things to make money off of me”

      Reddit seems to be leaking.

      • okamiueru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 days ago

        Dude. You’re reading a lot more into what you’re replying to, than what is there to be read. I bet “Reddit seems to be leaking” follows you around, huh?

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      Supposedly most of the benefit alcohol brings is in fact the idea that it helps people spend more time socializing, which has enormous benefits. A little poison for a lot of community can be a good trade.

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    15 days ago

    Alcohol is a carcinogen. No two ways about it. There aren’t really “safe” levels for a toxin; it’s not a matter of what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger, it’ll gradually and insidiously weaken you by ways of fatty liver disease and worse.

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      15 days ago

      Sunlight is also a carcinogen, but that doesn’t mean you always stay indoors.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 days ago

        No, of course not. You should apply sunscreen when outdoors

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          There’s no “safe” level of sunlight, even if you wear sunscreen.

          • ziltoid101@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            10 minutes of sun per day is typically less likely to give you cancer than 0 minutes. Vitamin D (and other compounds involved in the synthesis from cholesterol that you won’t get in supplements) upregulate DNA repair polymerases that protect against carcinogens. Of course after a few minutes the costs of UV exposure outweight this benefit though.

          • Krudler@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            15 days ago

            That is a highly myopic, frankly stupid, opinion that isn’t even yours - you’re just repeating things that you heard.

            The deleterious health effects from not getting sun exposure vastly outweigh the potential DNA damage from sun exposure.

  • Solumbran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    14 days ago

    So many people defending alcohol, it shows the current alcoholism problem.

    You get told that something useless (yes alcohol is useless, if you don’t agree you might already have a problem), that causes a LOT of deaths, violence and sickness, is absolutely not healthy (I struggle understanding how people were still believing that shit), and your reaction is to try to argue against it?

    Then people panic at the mention of sweeteners because “maybe they’re dangerous”, but for alcohol which is one of the biggest sources of avoidable deaths, nah, it’s probably fine, no matter what science says.

    Addiction is a sad thing.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      14 days ago

      Addiction is a sad thing.

      yeah god forbid someone find a bit of pleasure in the smouldering shitscape.

      • Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        I don’t think the person you’re replying to is talking about somebody having a few drinks on a weekend to take the edge off and relax. They’re talking about addiction, which is not pleasurable.

  • Mangoholic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    14 days ago

    Its nerve poison, never been healthy never will be. But its fun, relaxing and great in social settings to get even the most introverted to open up and enjoy socializing.

    • Tortellinius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Yes, this is what one study said. While biologically-speaking even a single drop of alcohol is bad for your body, the return effect from it is socialization, fun (only in moderation). If there were no positive effects it wouldn’t be used. In moderation it would be interesting to see the effects positive emotions have on the wellbeing.

      However, that being said it is still the worst drug and it is easily abused. I work as a bartender at a hotspot in my city. The degeneration of the mind many people go through is utterly disgusting. I don’t mind because they’re not me though. But I do mind cleaning up after them in the toilets, or when they proceed to be shitty to those around them… or worse.

      It goes the same as for any legal drug: Only use it when you consciously want to. Know when to stop. Drink a glass of water inbetween. And for the love of god don’t make it an excuse to be an ass. If you lose yourself in it you’re losing more than you get. Stopping to use any drug is a good thing.

  • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 days ago

    If there is any “health” benefit I could see the stress relief from a couple drinks doing less damage to your body than being in constant heavy stress. Pure speculation tho.

  • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    15 days ago

    Yeah, those scientists are just butthurt about never getting invited back to any parties. 🖕🏽