• NONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    People expect games that are ever more ambitious

    Nono, people expect Good games, that doesn’t have anything to do with ambition.

    • TwinTitans@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Exactly. Look at Nintendo. A fun game doesn’t mean you have to have bleeding edge visuals.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        Dear internet person, this whole discussion is being triggered because Nintendo, of all people, decided $100 was an acceptable price for a video game. They are the asshats who opened the flood gates for the corporate zombies to waltz in.

        • TwinTitans@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          I appreciate being formally addressed. Thank you.

          Unfortunately this will continue to happen with or without Nintendo being first to do it. They happened to be this time, and it’s BS. But now more than ever people need to vote with their wallets.

  • otacon239@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    8 days ago

    Absolutely no way Take-Two can afford anything less than $5B in profit every year. The stock market was a mistake.

  • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    If you really want me to pay $100 for a game, you gotta raise the bar to the fuckin stratosphere compared to what we’re getting now.

    And get me a damn raise.

    • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      I would say gta is one of the only few games I would pay that much for and I know I’ll get my moneys worth, but I’m not interested in gta online. I wish we could get story dlc like we did with gta 4

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    GTA 6 is just going to be client app to a universe of micro transactions. They should probably just give it away free.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yes, in fact the report specifically mentions that NBA 2k24 outperformed expectations. Other than that they’re probably earning passively off of older titles and GTA V microtransactions.

  • notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Maybe stop spending nigh decades and nigh billions of dollars designing these enormous catch all games that are supposed to appeal to everyone?

    I Don’t want to spend 90 dollars on a game that has 400 different things to do, 200 of which I enjoy.

    I’d rather give Sandfall 50 bucks for a lovingly crafted, focused game that’s actually, you know, good.

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      If they don’t spend enough money to differentiate themselves then they risk being drowned in a sea of indie games.

      Every year the number and quality of indie games increases. The ferocity of competition makes it extremely hard to get anyone to play your game, let alone survive as a developer. This raises the bar on quality to a ridiculous degree.

      Take any AAA game from the 1990s. Today that’s a single person project which can’t even compete with the most basic of indie games out there. To actually make money and support yourself as an indie developer is ridiculously hard!

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      The company made over 5 billion revenue and spent over 2 billion cost of operating in 2024, I don’t think this has anything to do with affordability.

      • notgivingmynametoamachine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Not sure I follow sir/ma’am - are you saying R* doesn’t have to price it at 90$ and they’ll still make money?

        I mean that’s true, but publicly traded companies are the devil themselves and are required to make as much money as possible.

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Look, the CEOs already have the fifth cheapest yacht chef available on their payroll, what are they supposed to do? Source the caviar themselves?

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 days ago

    They’ll charge whatever they think people will pay, and I’m pretty confident that many millions of people will fork over the $80 - $90 at launch. Prices come down when people stop buying.

  • molten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 days ago

    Look. I think all AAA companies should do $120 base price for all games. Piracy would have such a boom. Better platforms. many more seeders and good reviews and more freaks hell bent on cracking DRM.

  • CallateCoyote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 days ago

    Yeah? I’ll buy it when it’s on sale for $35 and they’ll profit, so it’s all good. Patience is a virtue and all that.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    As of a year ago, GTA 5 had made over $9,000,000,000.

    That’s a billion with a B.

    Mostly off micro transactions to children.

    They don’t need to charge $90, but if people will pay it, they’ll charge it.

  • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    I will wait until GTA 6 has been out a few years lol. I have a long enough backlog already. Still haven’t started Witcher 3, Cyberpunk, Ghost of Tsushima, Horizon Forbidden West, and about 30 other games I mean to play. Patient gaming is the best way

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    And it’s an impossible equation for most Americans to pay more. Especially if things continue to downward spiral.

    Where’s my eye patch?

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Heard the same crap when they moved from 60 to 70 just a few years back.

    Heard how video game development is too expensive while publishers posted record profits.

    Heard all about how the same 50 dollar game "back in the day"would cost hundreds now, disregarding how gaming was so much more niche back then too.

    Heard the same crap about how these “full price games” would lessen the need for egregious microtransaction

    This will again, do nothing to lessen any of that, just push more record profits as gamers won’t be able to resist rewarding the gaming industry for their bad behavior.

  • Slab_Bulkhead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 days ago

    if rockstar really wanted to win over all gamers, even the ones not planning to play gta, they announce base gta 6 at 50. and then have the 'early/access-10 min early-uber shark complete edition with a unique purple skin at 100 or whatever the fuck they think the whole things worth.