• randoot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    118
    ·
    10 days ago

    Ha only if. Autopilot turns off right before a crash so that Tesla can claim it was off and blame it on the driver. Look it up.

      • Sonicdemon86@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        10 days ago

        Mark Rober had a video on autopilot of several cars and he used his Tesla. The car turned off the autopilot when he crashed through a styrofaom wall.

        • randoot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          10 days ago

          This is how they claim autopilot is safer than human drivers. In reality Tesla has one of the highest fatality rates but magically all of those happen when autopilot was “off”

      • ChilledPeppers@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        But tesla doesn’t claim you can ever not overlook the car, so if you didn’t notice and stop it, it is your fault. Fuck elon and all that, but it is somewhat reasonable.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 days ago

        Most states apply liability to whoever is in the driver seat anyway. If you are operating the vehicle, even if you’re not controlling it at that moment, you are expected to maintain safe operation.

        That’s why the Uber self driving car that killed someone was considered the test driver’s fault and left Uber mostly off the hook.

        Not sure how it works for the robo taxis, though.

        • Allonzee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 days ago

          Yeah that’s gonna be tricky with those. I live in Vegas where they’re already operating. No steering wheel at all.

        • nekbardrun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          Well… What about blaming the passengers?

          Now, I would like to imagine the legal case of an accident involving a self driving robo-taxi transporting another robot to a facility (owned by the company).

          Maybe they can blame the humans who suffered the accident?

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      10 days ago

      Nah, it just disengages a fraction of a second before impact so they can claim “it wasn’t engaged at the moment of impact, so not our responsibility.”

      There were rumours about this for ages, but I honestly didn’t fully buy it until I saw it in Mark Rober’s vison vs lidar video and various other follow-ups to it.

  • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Tldr: Take the train and be safe.

    Rant: In the EU, you are 35x more likely to die from a car crash, compared to a train crash. The union has created the so-called Vision Zero program, which is designed to reach zero driving deaths by some arbitrarily chosen date in the future. And of course it talks about autonomously driving cars. You know, crazy idea, but what if instead of we bet it all on some hypothetical magic Jesus technology that may or may not exist by the arbitrarily chosen date and instead focus on the real world solution that we already have? But well, the car industry investors would make less money, so I can answer that myself. :(

    Edit: Also, Musk is a Nazi cunt who should die of cancer.