cm0002@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 2 months ago"thanks"lemmy.worldimagemessage-square12linkfedilinkarrow-up1153arrow-down115
arrow-up1138arrow-down1image"thanks"lemmy.worldcm0002@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square12linkfedilink
minus-squarethebestaquaman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·2 months agoI would think that, since it’s been recognised that these messages are costing a lot of energy (== money) to process, companies would at some point add a simple <if input == “thanks”> type filter to catch a solid portion of them. Why haven’t they?
minus-squareotacon239@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 months agoBecause the only progress we know how to make on computers is backwards it seems.
minus-squarewizblizz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoGenerative AI is supposed to be destructive. It’s a feature.
I would think that, since it’s been recognised that these messages are costing a lot of energy (== money) to process, companies would at some point add a simple <if input == “thanks”> type filter to catch a solid portion of them. Why haven’t they?
Because the only progress we know how to make on computers is backwards it seems.
Generative AI is supposed to be destructive. It’s a feature.