• QubaXR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    3 months ago

    Of course it is. First of many. The price will keep rising, since currently Microsoft is losing money on it. The number of games will decrease, the price will keep going up, the users will cancel, rinse and repeat.

    It truly is Netflix for gaming.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    At some point, it will only be worth it, if you either finish games at an alarming rate, or play so many different games, that buying them separately would make no sense

  • SolidShake@lemmy.worldBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not might be. Will be. They could charge $50 a month and get away with it. That’s what the Nintendo fanbase has proven. For me. Ultimate is worth $25 a month. Once it goes over that I’m out. I’ll stick to ps plus on its own.

    • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Then there is me, who has only had it when it was on $1 promo and I used it to get a 10% discount to buy a game, and then immediately cancel the pass.

      I guess if it stayed $1 indefinitely I’d keep the sub, but beyond that, nope.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I mean, I enjoy PS+, it’s just a matter of whether you’re okay playing a bunch of games on a known rental basis for the price point.

        I enjoyed playing Texas Chainsaw while it was on there. Now the game’s dead. To me, not much lost as I move on to other games (and I do buy games too)

        • lordnikon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah I agree with you on thinking of it as a new game fly. The problem I have is MS’s plan is to make gamers comfortable with only renting games by making it cheap then when there is no other option. They jack up the price.

          • Katana314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            I still haven’t seen the “no other option” scenario as so many claim. You could say $80 price tags do that, but if all prices are going up, that doesn’t track so much.

            They also discount games if you buy them while you have game pass. So there’s some encouragement to try a game, find you want to keep it, and pay for a permanent copy should it be removed from GP (or the player decides to stop the GP subscription).

            Still, I’m done with them because they’re done with talented studios, and are active participants in the Palestinian genocide.

            • lordnikon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              It’s more the trend of i have seen in the tech space of a deal too good to be true. A tech company taking a loss to gain marketshare and drive out competition on price or flat out buy them then when they have cornered the market drive up the price for insane profits and customers have no choice because you effectively become the platform.

              • Katana314@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                The video game market is extremely hard to “corner”. It can happen for professional software like document processing, image editing, etc, but far too many startups are interested in making games, and there’s multiple digital stores to sell them. Minecraft and Factorio even sold off their own websites. Clair Obscur recently outsold a lot of big publisher efforts, and definitely didn’t need Game Pass’s visibility.

                They can corner one particular audience like Call of Duty, but can only push so many expectations on them before those gamers consider other games. They tried it with Fallout, complete with subscription, and it was massively unpopular.

  • atomicpoet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    If it weren’t for me getting three months for free, I wouldn’t use it at all.

    For me, the problem is that there’s not enough games, and of the games that are there, they disappear too quickly.

    It’s just easier to look for deals on Steam, GOG, or EGS and keep those games indefinitely. Hell, sometimes games are given away for free.

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s already overpriced, but they will keep doing this as long as enough people tolerate it to make the numbers go up.

  • Aneb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Lol I haven’t paid my game pass subscription in years but I still have all the access

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    A bit pissed at this possibility. Games that I bought many years ago require me to be signed in to use my unlocks, even during solo play.