• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    Diminishing returns.

    4k on a 75in and 8k on a 75in isn’t a big difference.

    Not to mention most streaming content is 1080 for bandwidth and tvs upscale to 4k. So while there is difference, it’s hard to quantify upscaling, and even if you find a store with displays, they’re being fed native 4k.

    If you go to rtings.com or a similar site you can compare specifics and see that there is advancement happening.

    It’s just not like back in the day when they could keep doubling resolution.

  • ChinoKawaii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    fullHD already looks pretty good

    actually transfering all the data is a problem, like my wifi struggles even with streaming fullHD sometimes, so 4K is just unusable (+ you need a more expensive screen to actually show the 4K which I don’t have either)

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    OEMs forgot to add hardware support for AV1 because H.265 jumped the gun in an attempt to stay relevant with clout from H.264 lol.

  • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    As others mentioned it’s diminishing returns, but there’s still a lot of good innovation going on in the codec space. As an example - the reduction in the amount of space required for h265 compared to h264 is staggering. Codecs are a special form of black magic.

  • Sequentialsilence@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s cyclical, years ago, video quality improved dramatically, and then stagnated for almost 40 years as prices fell until it was economical for video quality to improve again. We likely won’t see a meaningful improvement for another 15-20 years, then prices will come down and then we’ll see another improvement.