Jerkface (any/all)

Two week old change. Rather pointed.

Source code availability only partially addresses !lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org’s concerns. I think this filter is funny but I think it’s muuuuuuch bigger dick move than adopting an affectation in some lemmy comments, and it doesn’t reflect well on PieFed. I’m not going to review all the code in the project, I’m just going to pay less attention to the project overall.

Edit: Oh look, you are that person!

Settle down. You’re on the verge of giving yourself skin failure.

You’re calling people names. It’s very obviously not “about DISCUSSION” for you right now. Those things are utterly incompatible. You’re presently seeking emotional gratification through abuse. The bizarre choice of “incel” comes across as projection when you talk like that.

Your previous comment missed the point so widely and smugly, it also fails to engage in meaningful “DISCUSSION”. It’s okay to say something stupid, just try not to be a raging asshole about it.

Are you joking right now? Acting like you just won the argument??

meanwhile NetBSD runs on toasters from the 90s

There’s basically no such thing as anonymized telemetry. The data provided is so rich, it is inherently identifying.

Whenever I hear about heart disease, I’m sure glad I have cancer!

The primary user has stated it’s because of AI. It doesn’t have to be effective to be the motivation. But also, the stated motivations don’t have to be the actual ones.

deleted by creator

That’s savage.

This infighting seems unproductive and frankly a waste of time.

as opposed to what pressing matters the community has on our plate?

Kraken Wanker by Gnome

Before the Internet, I read books. Everywhere, constantly. Haven’t read a book since the 90s, probably.

I recently switched some of my contacts from Signal to Matrix and I really prefer the user experience. The room-based model and the video chat features are great.

No, it’s a private and secure protocol (not corporation) thanks to end to end encryption. You can evaluate the protocol yourself with your own eyes, except clearly you cannot read, but modulo that.

Newsflash, chuckles: your IP address IS NOT ANONYMOUS. Any private protocol you use without going through Tor, i2p, or some similar anonymizing network IS NOT ANONYMOUS.

You’re attacking a strawman. Neither Signal nor anyone else has claimed the protocol or the service are anonymous. Which, yes, is something that every user should know before trusting it. They should understand what it means and what the consequences are. I’m honestly not sure you’re even there.

what is the point of making this distinction

because they are completely different things