Cool!! Will definitely check it out.

Convenient for me, that is.

Right, OK, I get what you mean.

Well, other than this:

but leashed dogs that are aggressive are worse than a well behaved but unleashed dog so I let the unleashed and behaved ones slide.

Why?

Getting shot in the head is worse than getting stabbed in the calf, but I still think you shouldn’t stab me in the calf! Obviously that’s a very extreme example, but these rules exist for a reason.

The dog may seem well-behaved for now, but what if it gets bothered by something random, as dogs do? The whole point of the rule is to prevent aggressive dogs from bothering people, because owners seem to always think their dogs wouldn’t hurt a fly. If you only complain about a dog being unleashed after a dog misbehaves, then aren’t you just asking for an issue to happen, instead of preventing it by enforcing the rule?

You get what I mean?

Then again, it does bother me when people don’t use crosswalks or cut in line lol

IDK, frankly I’m just straight up a dog hater. That’s why I posed a hypothetical. With dogs, I just really can’t stand them… Aren’t there like, dog parks or something, where the whole point is that they get to roam free without bothering people? Maybe that’s not available where you are. Maybe you’re really reasonable with when you do it.

I don’t know… I really find it hard to keep my [strong dislike] out of my thoughts here!

Yeah, that makes total sense.

but don’t want it to be required.

That was a key point of my question - that you agree that it should be required - but maybe it shouldn’t have been… Could you elaborate on this?

What would be something that upsets others, but you think shouldn’t be banned/required, you still think people should act in a certain way, but it doesn’t upset you when they don’t?

For me, I am extremely allergic to oysters

Damn, that must suck balls…

I called her out on it

Good on you, dude! I wish I called dog owners on their leash-less dogs more often…