Fast, cheap, good. They’re going for 1 out of 3.

I can’t help but think “Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly” with this news

Cyberpunk 2077. But I don’t have to wonder about it. Its happening already.

He’s afraid of losing his little empire.

OpenAI also had no clue on recreation the happy little accident that gave them chatGPT3. That’s mostly because their whole thing was using a simple model and brute forcing it with more data, more power, more nodes and then even more data and power until it produced results.

As expected, this isn’t sustainable. It’s beyond the point of decreasing returns. But Sam here has no idea on how to fix that with much better models so goes back to the one thing he knows: more data needed, just one more terabyte bro, ignore the copyright!

And now he’s blaming the Chinese into forcing him to use even more data.

That’s Stellantis. It’s the same company that’s building cards that are now showing ads when the car stops at a red light.

And if when the AI fails, buddy billionaires will be there to offer privatized alternative, for a fee of course.

Shifting blame before people learn it’s for a large part fossil fuel pollution causing autism, and the administration is going to do more drill baby drill.

How “Les Misérables” of them. Jean Valjean got 19 years for stealing bread. 15 years is light in comparison.

a few months later

Why are insurance companies just stopping with insuring houses and businesses? Without insurance, no loans, no economic activity!

Let’s study this. Aaand it’s defunded. Looks like it’ll remain a mystery, sir.

It’s why somebody make this. They too were missing the keyboard

I can’t go anywhere without seeing a few memorials of world war 2. They’re everywhere so we wouldn’t forget.

38% of the population as user. 20% daily active users. The classic way to grow is to squeeze the users and advertisers more and more with fees, subscriptions, tiers, … I guess the exodus at X has them spooked of what could happen if they continue with that plan, so they’re trying this AI thing.

Meta is probably screwed already. Their user base is not growing as before, maybe shrinking in some markets, and they need the padding to cover it up.

Opponents point out that encryption backdoors might not significantly improve law enforcement’s

There have been cases where police was granted access to the data, but the crimes it was supposed to stop just continued. Not enough personnel, equipment, too difficult or some excuse like that. But if you don’t have enough resources to use the data in a meaningful way, why grant access?

That brings us to the next part, abuse of that data. There have been cases where the access to the data is used to go after organisers of legal protest against environment or labor. Going after certain political parties to harass them, usually left wing, also happens. And there have been cases of police using their access to stalk an ex.

It doesn’t seem to be a net positive.

deleted by creator

Of course they’re conveniently ignoring refineries catching fire or even gas station explosions. That seem to be regular events.

Social media has a very good ratio of information spreading versus effort required. It’s also why it’s a popular thing for misinformation and influence campaigns.

In contrast, if a government agency wants to make a website for this, it probably needs a proposal, budget request, approval by a commission, a bidding process, and other bureaucatic procedures put in place by politicians that wanted to lower spending.