Japanese cars are superior to American cars, why wouldn’t their rockets be?

You will find that everyone who has faith claims to have a good reason to believe in it.

Good reason is subjective. I require evidence before I believe something.

If you have proof, you don’t trust, you know.

Trust can be placed based on past experiences. I trust my sister will call me. I have faith in nothing.

I trust the scientific method, I don’t have faith.

Trust and faith should not be used interchangeably.

Trust means that you have good reason to believe in something.

Faith is just wishing on a star.

Part of the problem is the “publish or die” mentality.

Personally, I think the Journal of Negative Results needs more love.

Faith specifically refers to religion. Allowing them to use it in regards to science is where we got these loons claiming that science is a religion.

Or they need a competent journalist to translate the findings without being sensational.

Most people can’t read a case study, and fewer can understand it.

This is the problem.

They don’t need belief and faith, they need to trust it. Something that both Republicans and Democrats have eroded because it didn’t fit their narrative.

There’s a little bit in a hypothesis

Not in a properly formed hypothesis.

You shouldn’t have faith in anything in science.

Science doesn’t require belief.

The problem is that people believe in religion, and their religious leaders have a vested interest in keeping them dumb.

Belief has nothing to do with science.

Nature has charged crazy fees to publish and view work.

I’m pretty sure it’s greed.

Information should be freely accessible to the public.

Greed, most likely.

Mullvad.

I couldn’t see where it was located, but the staff having the Gadsden flag doesn’t inspire confidence. I’d pass on it for that reason alone.