Thank you for your helpful comments. I’ll look into Canoeboot more, but will probably still flash GNU Boot.

I took into consideration what you said about security, and overall, I believe you’re right.

In conclusion, I appreciate your advise and will look further into canoeboot, security, and the framework Risc V motherboard in addition to Risc V in general.

Lots to cover so let’s start one by one: Firstly, even trying to put my GNU biase aside, canoeboot is just libreboot with the non free stuff removed. The problem with that is it has been shown to allow some non-free firmware in a recent version, and so, I feel like using a more independent free bios would be better atleast for me. I understand the fact about the chip itself being non-free, but as for a laptop, that’s just the most free you can get right now (do correct me if I’m wrong), so it’s better to use the most free option rather than using a less free option because the most free option isn’t fully free. I completely agree and can’t emphasise that enough: The FSF and GNU are not made for security. A lot of people especially the ones complaining how not allowing microcode updates allows for security risks don’t understand that the FSF’s and GNU’s goals are to protect user freedom. I don’t believe in a society without phones, it’s just if those phones exist, they should be free, transparent, and respect user privacy. Finally, I did know about riscv, but as you mention, I also knew that there were no 100% free boards. By designs, they still need the proper tools and need to be done by a proper computer engineer right? The framework board isn’t 100% free right?

I’m simply providing an alternative. We all know ultra-processed food is bad, but that alone doesn’t help anyone be healthy. They need to know what to eat (in this case) use instead. Yeah I carry it by putting it in the same light and small backpack I put my other stuff in when going out. I do not use WhatsApp and do not have a phone number. Counterintuitive to go through all the troubles of being as free and as private as possible and then use WhatsApp spyware and a phone number

deleted by creator

Palantir

I completely agree with you. I can’t believe how people still worship Torvalds, while Stallman, an open capitalist, has done more radical socialist things than Linus by miles. I used to ask myself why people praise Torvalds yet reject radical contributors that started, spread, and work on free software that include BIOS and full on operating systems with a developer team consisting of a few contributors living off of donations and advocating against surveillance, non-free software, DRM, and other capitalist dystopian practices, but now I clearly know that people will do anything they can to avoid being even the slightest of radical. Wether it is with software, technology, economic systems, governments, and more, people don’t want to change as change is uncomfortable, so, as a result, you have people like Torvalds, movements like democratic “socialism”, and corporate whitewash like “open source”.

Everyone on twitter is