Human communication isn’t perfect. Some people have too many emails. Others need cues only audio visual interaction can provide to quickly parse info.
Use numbering, paragraphs etc.
Its their responsibility to read shit but its yours to be clear and concise.
Turn the lights out
Have americans always been stupid? Yes. Have americans always been this stupid? No.
Probably took a “news break”
Then perish, OpenAI. If your only innovation is a legal loophole then you did nothing.
Are they going to outsource data entry to india? All AI “benefits” are almost solely derived from outsourcing.
Who am I kidding, this is probably just a scheme to get the government to pay for “Grok” which might as well be a word that means “garbage”
I’m feverishly imagining smart phones with old school slider keyboards
Where’s the gofundme for the firefox fork project?
Was this from google turning off the funding tap?
Anything from twitter should be suspect, especially without a date. I get your point though, I’ll note screenshot is fake.
We live in a criminally stupid country but Musk is doing his best to show everyone that being a billionaire should be a crime.
Edit: the tweet is fake, btw
Its open source lol. Why don’t the tech billionaires innovate? Instead they just ban competitors
the 23% of people who didn’t vote for garbage collector… Are they hoarders?
power users/businesses: “you can’t go VIRAL on mastodon”
Regular Users: “yOu HaVe To PiCk A sErVeR???”
Trump is well known to lie and take every position under the sun and nearby rocks, so saying things like “Trump doesn’t want war” is basically nonsense psychic mind reading. Rather than cherry picking responses it makes more sense to look at a politician’s actions in bulk. eg “What choices do they typically make?”
He bombed Syria, helped Saudi Arabia massacre people in Yemen and bombed an Iranian government official in Iraq in hopes of starting a war with Iran. These are not the actions of an anti war candidate.
Similarly saying “peacefully” once in a speech then following it with 10-20 “fight like hells” and similar over the next 50 minutes isn’t really that convincing of an argument. If I told you to be peaceful once and told you to fight somebody 10-20 times, what would your takeaway be?
A jury convicted Trump, not E Jean Caroll. Her testimony was a piece, but again a jury takes into account things like the fact that he frequently used assaulting women in changing rooms as a routine he employed. He had statements suggesting assaulting women was just normal behavior for a celebrity.
If you want to cherry pick Trump’s history that’s fine, just know that everybody sees you lying to them and will see you as a liar.
Wouldn’t I be in like empty space?