thejre’s the people power revolution in the phillippines back in 1986
DylanMc6 [any, any]
Yo, my name is Dylan but you can call me DIlly.
As seen on Hexbear.
I’m still non-binary.
Seriously!
- 0 Posts
- 18 Comments
what about peaceful revolutions (as long as they DON’T even escalate)?
DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.mlto
memes@lemmy.world•don't expect consistency in an inconsistent world
1·15 hours agoat least nietzsche DIDN’T get shot
-
i think the message for that song is “you can vote, but you may NOT be sure about who you voted”
-
i assume by “genuine democracy”, you mean like-minded political parties in a coalition (or lack thereof). oh and the us is a two-party system that silences most third parties
-
so voting AND revolution are both good
a bit of film trivia: in a draft of the film idiocracy, the character frito was originally named dizz, and was described as a “mid-30s fatass”, but that changed to just “mid-30s” when dax shepard played him
then joe/not sure convinces the cabinet that he can talk to pcs and they need to be built a bit better.
DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.mlto
memes@lemmy.world•don't expect consistency in an inconsistent world
1·16 hours agowhy does the person on the left look like john wilkes booth?
maybe a revolution can work if NOT voting
-
the lyrics said “you might vote for someone else, and i might wanna change your mind, so vote and don’t today” and “vote and know it might NOT make a difference; you might see the contradiction, but they’re NOT talking to you”. thank frick for making linking stuff easier here.
-
if voting CAN’T help, then a revolution would be the next method. oh and do you think indirect voting, and a one-party system (or multiple like-minded parties under a coalition like china or the dprk) is better?
-
what about classbaiting?
like speed bumps?
voting is actually the way to go, and would probably help get fascism out of the government. vote or don’t.
the iq test is indeed BS, and was built on hatefulness and eugenics - is there an alternative to the iq test? i was thinking of the sat.
surveillance like this violates the non-aggression principle (which, being someone who’s left-libertarian, should be rewritten and reinterpreted to say ‘DON’T use force or coercion on anyone, except for self-defense, or the defense of your community’)
what about freemasons?

time to toss it