• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    what the fuck is this appeals court smoking?

    A big joint labeled “AIPAC” that got passed to them in a Federalist Society blunt rotation.

    You cannot dictate what a business or individual spends its money on or why.

    You absolutely can and we routinely do. Just look at the embargo of Cuba, for instance.

      • chillpanzee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        And yet… I would’t bat an eye if I saw a new executive order tomorrow requiring that.

        • roofuskit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Executive orders aren’t worth shit to citizens. All he can do is order the executive branch around.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Where do you think Walmart gets its merch? You’re just pointing to different steps in the supply chain.

        The anti-BDS rules are, functionally speaking, not even bans on how you engage with the economy. They’re bans on your speech. You can go to Walmart or not. You can buy things or not. What you can’t do is step outside the store and announce “I didn’t purchase a Sodastream specifically because it would profit Israel”.

        And, again, going back to Morse v. Frederick and Harisiades v. Shaughnessy and United States v. O’Brien all lay out instances in which the US government can restrict speech. This is just the latest encroachment.