wikipediasuckscoop@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agoHouse Republicans Investigate Wikipedia Over Alleged Biaswww.nbcpalmsprings.comexternal-linkmessage-square26linkfedilinkarrow-up1138arrow-down14
arrow-up1134arrow-down1external-linkHouse Republicans Investigate Wikipedia Over Alleged Biaswww.nbcpalmsprings.comwikipediasuckscoop@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square26linkfedilink
minus-squaresalty_chief@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down22·3 days agoI don’t make the rules for NY colleges.
minus-squareozymandias117@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·3 days agoTheir point is that you don’t understand why you can’t cite any encyclopedia, not just Wikipedia. It has nothing to do with the reliability, you just need to cite their source (the primary source) instead of citing the middle man.
minus-squareSckharshantallas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·edit-21 day agoYou totally misunderstood the comment.
minus-squareGrammarPolice@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·3 days agoBait used to be believable
I don’t make the rules for NY colleges.
Their point is that you don’t understand why you can’t cite any encyclopedia, not just Wikipedia.
It has nothing to do with the reliability, you just need to cite their source (the primary source) instead of citing the middle man.
You totally misunderstood the comment.
Bait used to be believable
deleted by creator
Yep, graduated!