• Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Is it just my ADHD, or did the article completely fail to mention why a streamer was forced by two other streamers to stay awake and ingest poison? Did they hold his family for ransom or something? I need context.

    • Schlemmy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      His streams were about self deprecation, humiliation and abuse. He let those two guys abuse him to the limit and apparently they went over the limit.

      It was with consent but they still be charged with murder and probably get convicted too.

      This went on for weeks, months, and nobody interfered. They just gave a platform for the abuse.

  • fluxion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    11 days ago

    They deserve to pay every dime of it. They exploited this man’s torture with full knowledge of what they were doing to him on stream after multiple complaints

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      I mean, Kick probably could be suspending people who stream for an unhealthily long time, maybe suspend his abusive friends, but they didn’t force him to take any actions resulting in his death imo.

      What exactly is the crime?

  • CatsGoMOW@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    11 days ago

    This is straight out of Black Mirror S7E1 and the idea behind the “Dum Dummies” site. 😭

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    What changed between the ‘months of torture’ and Naruto and Safine being arrested, and the '10 days ’ leading up to his death?

    It sounds sick that the French government would decide a man is being tortured yet they’re not obligated to intervene… while at the same time they fine a company for not stepping in.

    If this man was negligently killed, authorities and kick are to blame, but it’s the authorities that should’ve been the failsafe, not the company. I guess it makes sense that French politicians are Very Mad™ and Seriously Considering Bigger Punishments™.

  • mrdown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 days ago

    The autority should be held accountable too since they opened an investigation but did not force the streamers to temporarly stop streaming till the investigation is finished

  • cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    From libé article:

    Raphaël Graven, 46, known under the pseudonym Jean Pormanove, died near Nice during a live broadcast on August 18 on the Australian video platform Kick after more than 12 days of live streaming showing him and another man being assaulted and humiliated by two people. Followed by nearly 200,000 viewers, the “Jeanpormanove” channel had for months shown Raphaël Graven being insulted, beaten, having his hair pulled, threatened, and even being shot at without protection with paintball projectiles. According to the channel’s promoters, the content was staged.

    Deputy Minister for Digital Affairs Clara Chappaz on Tuesday announced her intention to sue the Kick platform for “breach.” She made the announcement after a meeting convened at Bercy with officials from several ministries (Justice, Interior, Economy) and two independent authorities, accusing Kick of violating the 2004 Digital Trust law.