• 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    20 days ago

    i think the best solution (besides globes which are impractical on screens/posters) is having no standard, expose kids in school to 3 or 4 different projections so they learn there’s no standard and all protections are as valid and all with drawbacks and advantages.

    • DampCanary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      I don’t get it,
      from my memory of geography class in 5th to 8th grade, in elementary, we extensively learned about all kinds of maps, and projections, so teaching kids 3-4 is huge downgrade.

      • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 days ago

        didn’t mean only teach 3-4, just to not regularly use one projection. use a handful so no one instinctively learns to accept one.

        even though you learned a lot of maps, it’s likely most maps you used when not learning about different projections were the same.

        • DampCanary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          Most likely, because I would guess that >90% of my up to date (after middle school) use of maps was highly localised to plaxe of interest.
          Which doesn’t really show projection type (or brings relevance of it to surface).