• RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    30 days ago

    I cant even think of any legit reason to do this. To protect children? The government does not care about children. Its why so many suffer in poverty. Watching tits online is the least of their problems.

    The only reasons i can think of is control. Forcing people to give up more information about themselves. Because knowledge is power.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      29 days ago

      The reason is that we all live in capitalist dictatorships masquerading as “democracy”, and are rapidly approaching a time when climate change, wealth inequality, and automation will see widespread revolt of the proles, so the ruling class is tightening its grip, and going all in on fascism.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      29 days ago

      It’s really simple.

      The western democracies want to create a universal digital ID wallet and have that be required to access any site.

      There are a lot of reasons they could want this. For example, there are probably tens of millions of fake accounts controlled by adversarial nations which are used to sow extremism and disinformation online. It is impossible for counterintelligence to detect these at scale. We can see the corrosive effects that social media is having on society, there are countries actively working to make the problem worse but we have no tools to stop them.

      This is also why there is a big push to limit children from accessing social media. They’re often the targets for these campaigns because they’re easily manipulated and have a lot of free time to spread the misinformation once they’re indoctrinated.

      I don’t think a digital ID is the way to solve this problem. But, we’re not being asked or informed about why it is happening. They’re, instead, trying to ram these measures through using moral panic about children so anybody opposing them is easily dismissed as “not caring about The Children” or “supporting sex trafficking/pedophiles/predators”.

      I understand the situation, but they’re trying to go around the democratic process by not talking about the problems.

      • baru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        In the EU similar stuff is promoted by companies wanting to profit from supplying the various required software.

      • Tryenjer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        Bullshit. Our leaders want more power over the masses, they want to become autocrats, that’s it. Fuck them.

  • shneancy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    29 days ago

    the brits really need to learn from the french how to protest. it’s been nearly a month and i haven’t heard of even a measly car being set on fire, just one petition that got a reply akin to “lol, nah”. the french would’ve set a car on fire for less is all i’m saying

  • mysticmartz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    29 days ago

    We need to build a decentralised internet quickly using I2P or something similar and scale and decentralise quickly. VPN’s will be the first to go then TOR after they attempt to control the exit nodes .

    We need to show the governments that we are allowed to use encryption and Wikipedia and not be treated as criminals for wanting privacy .

  • themurphy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    Scotland might finally leave the UK because of this. It has been close before, but this must do it by now.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      Email your MEPs, push back on the narrative that it protects children. IF it even did protect children it would be at the cost of any semblamce of privacy. Politicians are also exempt despite a pedo politician leading a major world power right now.

      I got an immediate response explaining their stance is based almost entirely around the disemination of csam.

      It is a noble goal but akin to ending traffic deaths by mandating getting and checking the coast is clear every 10 meters.