• dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 month ago

    The US President is not subject to laws, when acting in his official capacity, unless at least 1/2 of the House and 2/3 of the Senate vote to impeach him. So winning the election is a license to do illegal things, if you have enough political support.

    • MissJinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      He’s been doing illegal tgings since before he was president, he doesn’t give a shit and neither anyone else

      • Eagle0110@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        So the answer is very clear, when laws/agreements/contracts/etc. no longer have an effect at all, usually authority becomes solely defined by force and force alone.

        I fear it’s only a matter of time before a civil war breaks out.

        • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          There will never be a civil war. Americans are too lazy, selfish, and stupid to actively rise up. You’ll get some groups and people trying to rebel, but the masses will just see them as disruptive to their ‘comfortable’ lives. Ultimately, for all of America’s ego and pride, the people are sheep.

  • Weirdfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    He is commander in chief of the US military.

    The US military stresses disobeying illegal orders.

    So the simple answer is the US military chain of command respecting their oath to the constitution over loyalty to Trump.

      • Weirdfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        The chain of command goes from the secretary of defense all the way down to the most junior enlisted personnel.

        You seem to assume I meant the joint chiefs or some small hand full of senior commanders.

        Generals don’t pull the trigger, and as someone else pointed out, the logistics involved with bombing a city includes hundreds of service members.

        Not sure where you get off calling me clueless as my initial response exactly answers the original question.

        If not for honorable service members respecting their oaths and the UCMJ, there is literally nothing stopping Trump from bombing Chicago or LA.

          • Weirdfish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            If your point is that this mechanism won’t work, then I’m assuming your point is that nothing can stop Trump.

            Doesn’t mean my answer was wrong or clueless, only that the means to stop him has failed.

            If you think something else is stopping him, I’d be very curious what that might be.

              • Weirdfish@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 month ago

                Well, let’s see.

                It won’t be his moral fiber.

                It won’t be China or Russia the only two military powers that have a chance to have any influence on CONUS affairs.

                Maybe his desperate desire for public approval as I suspect major ordinance dropped on a US population center isn’t going to poll well, but I’d hate to count on that.

                Me? Stop the president from doing literally anything? You vastly over estimate my powers.

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        You need hundreds of people all working together to drop a bomb on a US city. Commanders, officers, maintenance workers, ordinance loaders, pilots, navigators, even base MPs.

        You really think you can get all of these people to agree to drop a bomb on a civilian US city, just on a Trump whim?

        Come now.

        • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          The smaller the pieces you divide a job into, the less likely that any of the individual steps understand the entire process.

          You tell one guy to bomb NYC, he’s going to stop and think about that.

          You tell a hundred people to push a few buttons, and they’re just doing their job.

          • shalafi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Many of these people are trying to do their 20 and get out with retirement. They’re not going to quit like it’s a shit job at McDonald’s.

              • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Arguing with US nationalism is fucking merry-go-round. They’re always expecting that one hero that’ll topple generations of conditioning, like a superman. When they’ve shown time and again they are very capable of horrible fucking shit throughout the history.

                They act like their contrymen are somehow morally superior group of people who stopped killing civillians at Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria or even their own countrymen. History books say no, their policians hide the crimes (revealed years later) and these people still eat the propaganda for breakfast.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Look at it this way, Trump is legally capable of firing the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank (Jerome Powell), and he hates that man’s fucking guts. Practically speaking though, Trump can’t sack the guy without sending shockwaves through the financial world and tanking our economy. At the moment, Trump is trying to trump up (heh) a reason to fire Powell because he can’t do it by fiat.

    If his hands are tied over this thing he can legally do, you think he’d be able to bomb American cities? Think even the stoutest MAGA would applaud the bombing of New Orleans? They’re turning on him over the pedo thing, destroying an American city is two orders of magnitude worse.

    • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      They’re turning on him over the pedo thing

      Sure thing bud, it’s definitely not performatory thing at all. They’re going to rise up anytime with their gums and milifia anytime noe.

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 month ago

    Keep in mind that he already ordered the military forces to siege US cities, and they gone through the process of doing it while refusing to escalate into actual violence.

    Trump doesn’t seem to have that much control. I’m not sure he would be arrested if he ordered a strike, but I don’t think it would happen either.

  • TomMasz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    Could stop him or would stop him? SCOTUS has granted him blanket immunity for anything done as an “official act”, without bothering to specify exactly what an official act is. This has opened up a Pandora’s Box, needless to say. They’re literally expanding the power of the President, not limiting it.

    Congress, since it is fully GOP-dominated, will neither impeach him nor attempt to override any veto should they pass laws to curtail his activities. Not that they would, of course.

    The military has a duty to follow the Constitution and is supposed to disregard any orders to the contrary. But whether the military will act according to Trump or the Constitution is an open question. Remember, Trump has removed a number of senior officers whose loyalty to him was in question. And there are a lot of right-wing extremist types in the lower ranks of the military.

    In short, we’re probably FUCKED.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    How familiar are you with the concept of civil war?

    If he would go to bomb an American city a civil war will start. Then they authority to stop him or not will rely on the winner of the war.

  • Invertedouroboros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    On paper there’s plenty that could. The Supreme Court could have stepped in to stop a lot of this. Executive orders only stand in places where a full fledged law from congress doesn’t cover the issue. The military is theoretically as obligated to disobey an unlawful order as they are to obey a lawful one and states are theoretically pretty insulated from federal interference except in a few explicit areas.

    But, we don’t live on paper and none of those protections exist unless there are people out there who are ready, willing, and able, to act on them. What happens if the Supreme Court somehow manages to rule against the administration and they just flagrantly disregard the order? What happens if Trump orders the military to start attacking US citizens openly or starts an illegal war without congressional approval? What happens if Trump runs for president again in 2028? Or just says he’s president for life and we’re not doing elections anymore?

    The answer is nothing, unless people stand up against him. And… so far… we haven’t seen much of that. Not from people in government at any rate. We’ve seen a bit from normal folks on the ground in places like LA, but our government’s been working to neuter the power of popular protest since the civil rights protests, perhaps even earlier. So reasonable people can disagree on the efficacy of that.

    I really don’t want to echo the doomer line I’ve seen written here a lot, but yeah, we’re probably fucked. Like maybe if something was done like… a decade ago? Two? Maybe we wouldn’t be in this situation. But… as things stand? I don’t even know if the damage from the first Trump presidency can ever truly be repaired and more damage is being done on a weekly, almost a daily basis. Personally? I think it’s only a matter of time before this man breaks the global economy irreparably. In a way that simply can’t be swept under the rug again. Domestically? Who the fuck knows at this point? I have to resist the urge to laugh out loud whenever people ask where I see myself in five years because at this point I’ve got no idea what the next two weeks are gonna hold.

    So… yeah. Fun times in the ol US of A.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    No, the USA is not fucked.

    Everything happening now has happened before, and worse, and the USA has endured. It may take some time, but the US will be fine.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      The difference is now there are countries who have their shit together and will happily let the US become irrelevant.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    You’re either trolling or you’re too far gone from reality to get back.

      • zxqwas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Noone, I just think that anyone who thinks he would get away with bombing a city is either trolling or has a tinfoil hat so heavy they would not get phone reception under it.

        I’ll assume it’s a troll and thought it useless to feed him attention.