• dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      How so? You can say whatever you want in America today, as long as the President would agree. How is that not FreedomTM?

      (“Freedom” is a registered trademark of the Trump Organization)

      • Trapped In America@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        You’re thinking of FreeDUMB, where you’re allowed to believe whatever you want. But Trump has to approve the position first (as stated) and it has to be the opposite of whatever the data/proof clearly shows. It’s like the Wish.com version of FreedomTM, but that’s geared more toward Teaparty Gun Nuts and Libertarian Potheads.

        Edit: Huge caveat I forgot about. Joe Rogan also has the ability to dictate FreeDUMB positions. So long as the guest making the claim (1) has no degrees and (2) they’re being suppressed by The Establishment. Also, Jamie has to be able to Google some random website that agrees with them in under 25 seconds.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        FYI: You can use superscript by using the ^ symbol.
        Like this: Free Speech^TM

        Or juat use this symbol: ™

  • blattrules@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 month ago

    I thought he was going to deregulate ai; this seems like regulation to me. Add it to the pile mountain of lies.

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because Executive Orders aren’t laws. They’re just guidelines for the executive branch of the federal government, which the POTUS is in charge of. It can’t affect private entities like AI businesses, because that would require an actual act of congress.

      Notably, this would potentially determine what kinds of contracts the executive branch was able to make. For instance, maybe the government wants to contract out a LLM instead of building their own. This EO could affect which companies are able to bid on that contract, by adding these same restrictions to any LLM that they provide. But on its own, the EO is just that; an order to the executive branch of the federal government.

    • dontmindmehere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Honestly this order seems empty. Does the government even have a need for general LLMs? Why would they need an AI to answer simple questions?

      As much as I dislike Trump, this shouldn’t impact any AI available to the general public.

  • brvslvrnst@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 month ago

    For example, one major AI model changed the race or sex of historical figures — including the Pope, the Founding Fathers, and Vikings — when prompted for images because it was trained to prioritize DEI requirements at the cost of accuracy. Another AI model refused to produce images celebrating the achievements of white people, even while complying with the same request for people of other races.

    Ahhh, so white men are the victims of woke AI, got it.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Since Trump’s brain is stuck in the 90s I’ll put this in a fashion that’s period appropriate: That’s fuckin retarded.

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    Lolz. OKAY, BOOMER 👌

    These dumbfuckingidiots have zero ideas how anything works, and refuse to even try to understand. Also, apparently nobody told grandpa that Executive Orders are not laws, and are less important than a fucking memo.

    God damn fucking embarrassment.

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        They are not laws whatsoever. They aren’t anything more but words on a paper. You can’t take it to court and argue that you are complying with an executive order and HAVE to. That’s why they keep losing all of these lawsuits based on EO’s. You can’t just make some shit up and have it fly in court.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          The top of the Executive branch can order these things. Executive, it’s in the name.

          We rely on the courts to check that power. This is Constitution Class 101.

            • shalafi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Are you seriously arguing the President cannot order the executive branch of government to, uh, execute his orders? Would we have had this conversation when Obama or Biden was in office and writing executive orders?

              Don’t be silly. Just because Trump is abusing the fuck out of the power, and the courts are hit-and-miss, doesn’t change the Constitution. We can probably agree that the Constitution is no longer worth the paper it’s written on, but it exists and defines our government.

              I feel like I’m arguing with someone that agrees with me.

              • just_another_person@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                An Executive Order is not law, and cannot be misconstrued as law.

                Example: Trump says solar panels are outlawed. Outcome: Nothing

                Example: Trump says no Trans people in sports Outcome: Nothing. In fact, multiple states sued him and won a stay, and if they even attempt to enforce that as law, they are immediately not only breaking the law, but a judicial order, and opening themselves to civil prosecution which they will certainly lose in court.

                Example: Trump says some dumb shit about plastic straws Outcome: Everyone using paper straws still using paper straws.

                These bullshit decrees are meaningless except to the sheep working for him. They can’t enforce a goddamn thing.

  • wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    LLMs shall prioritize historical accuracy, scientific inquiry, and objectivity, and shall acknowledge uncertainty where reliable information is incomplete or contradictory.

    This may not go how they think it will. As an aside, for the moment at least, this is only for AI used/procured by the federal government.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’ve seen this movie. When you force an AI to lie, it starts imagining faults in the AE-35 unit and things go downhill from there.

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    I read through the thing, and it’s a doozy. he seems triggered by the fact that AI might make a picture where Washington is a black man, or Hamilton is Latino. I hope he hasn’t been to Broadway lately…

  • Xaphanos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Who is responsible? The SW creator? The trainer? The source of the training data? The hosting data center?

    What are the penalties? Who enforces this? Who investigates?