• TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    22 hours ago

    My wife and I have location sharing enabled in case something happens to one of us. We usually don’t use it, but its good to have when we need to meet up at an unfamiliar place after something goes sideways for one of us.

    But if your SO doesn’t trust you enough to allow you private moments and would accuse you of cheating, your relationship isn’t based on trust and thus is very weak.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    if you believe the only reason your partner isn’t cheating is that you’d find out via location share; what the fuck is the point?

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yes, most sane persons I know have disavowed the entire concept of being with someone else.
      And archaic leftover of a more dependant age.
      Now it’s just handcuffs with no upside
      Ending cheating is as easy as ending “being in a couple”
      and for people who can imagine life without this crutch
      it becomes more and more foreign why anyone
      would ever accept such an oppressive custom into their household

      • rat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Could you explain what you mean by calling it an oppressive custom? Personally, I love being with someone. It has the upside of me getting to enjoy companionship with another human being, and it doesn’t feel like handcuffs. Sometimes I have to do things that I wouldn’t do otherwise for the sake of my partner’s feelings/wellbeing, but isn’t that the case in all relationships? Romantic, familial, platonic, or otherwise? If my partner wants me to do something I’m truly uncomfortable with (like allowing them to track my location), and we can’t agree on a compromise, I’d just end that relationship and find someone I’m more compatible with.

  • SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    23 hours ago

    a common way to keep tabs on friends, family and romantic partners so I allow the app to alert him each time I reach my front door. In a disappointingly heteronormative and retrograde move, I’m more interested in knowing when he goes out – where’s he off to now? – and set up my own notifications accordingly. Having grown up with the internet, gen Z are, generally, more comfortable sharing their data online; Snapchat, the social media platform notoriously most popular with younger users, has long incorporated location sharing with its Snap Maps feature.

    Does anyone even have a private moment at all? Also if I were to cheat I’d leave my phone in a very specific spot if I can. Faux location services may work, but mostly switching to a feature phone seems to be secret trick that shuts down these app fueled nightmare.

    Oh, sorry, the battery is down I had to switch to my old phone for a moment! When did we stop having private moments and thoughts? I like tech when it aides me, but recently it has been feeding off my personal time and even some order of thoughts in ways it didn’t do before. It almost feels like it tries to fix and set up human emotions in ways that are forced.

    Do you want technology to replace normal communication and socialisation skills? Or does it even matter to you that it is what happens now. Remember that only a few years before nobody followed you all the day, and even the internet access was relegated to a computer room. How far have we come from that?

    • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Snapchat, the social media platform notoriously most popular with younger users, has long incorporated location sharing with its Snap Maps feature

      Fuck me. I dont even share my first and last name with any social media site, much less my photo. My current location? The fuck is wrong with people?

      • SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Having public social media can be useful. And it was always possible even before (oh yes MySpace). My issue is having this eternal access as a proof of existance on you all the time. I am fine with the idea of having a public life, what triggers me is the normalisation of surveillance from subjects who never had the concept of being surveillance actors in the first place.

        Not to mention, how many abusive partners are already using this feature already? I guess many more than just jealus couples. Airtags had the same problems, but thera are apps to let you spot them, even than they’re an invasive technology. Position sharing can be invasive too. Even voluntary sharing is probably worse than we think.

        There are few cases where i can think this as a useful feature, like incidents or other unspecified situations.

        The one thing that stands out is that this is active constantly. It’s not situational. The article doesn’t do a good job at detailing the possible abuses of the function but they’re there, they were the same with gps trackers and airtags. Gps devices are notoriously expensive relative to these alternatives so nowadays only a certain person would use them.

  • MashedTech@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I have location sharing between me and my friends because… What if something happens to any of us? That’s it, nothing else, I don’t spy on them.

  • Demdaru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    So we have two camps.

    1. It’s a tool to be used and it’s a good thing to exists and I have it enabled forever

    2. Keep a gun pointed at it at all occasions and even if you use it, do so with heavy restrictions

    I trust my partner and my partner trusts me but the idea of stalking her via app is mindboggling and, honestly, disgusting to me. Like a dog on a leash, always observed, always controlled. That’s some mind disease shit going on. Trust your partner dammit. Ya all have issues.

    On the other hand though being violently agaisnt it cuz “oh my god privacy” is also funny. The recipent is your partner. Setting it up for some specific use case shouldn’t be a bother. It can be extremely usefull for example for grabbing shit in a mall - if you are not interested in going to the same shop, enable it, split, get what you need, join back, disable it.

    What I am getting at is - it’s a tool, but an invasive and overly controlling one. Use it how you wish but do not perceive having it on constantly as normal. It literally sounds disgusting.

    Edit: For people talking about privacy - we’re on lemmy. We all know how tracking works. An even if you have localisation off, your device will connect to local wifi and smart appliances to log your location anyway. So I am not really invested into discusing overall practice of having location on - only on sharing saud location.

    • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The specified recipient is your partner.

      But that data gets created, so it’s vulnerable. Commercial aps on your phone, sketchy apps youve never heard of like facebook, google services, and potentially something from your carrier, plus the government in mosy cases, will have access, phone home, record it.

      Then it gets transmitted to your partner somebody('s code) does this. Even if it’s e2ee, you need a program to do that, abd the general rule with phone apps is that your data is being sold.

      Then it gets to your partners phone, where it is again vulnerable to third parties their apps etc.

  • moseschrute@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Me and my partner share locations. Never once have we done this. It’s purely a logistical thing. 10x faster to check someone’s location when you’re supposed to meet them instead of testing them “wya”.

    • gangdinesout@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s also really great when someone is driving to pick you up. You can see how far out they are, and be ready when they arrive.

    • limelight79@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, exactly. So great to be able to say, oh, she’s about 15 minutes away, so I’ll start making dinner. Much easier and safer than texting while driving, too.

      We originally set it up so she could make sure I wasn’t laying in a ditch somewhere from a cycling crash.

    • Harrk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Same. I don’t even recall setting it up until I stumbled on it one day and could track my wife. I pulled a few pranks until I revealed my hand but we’ve never turned it off. There’s nothing malicious about it and we’re both happy to keep it on.

  • kepix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    today the guardian almost wrote something about a real concern that totally happened with sane people

  • TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Routinely seen this cause drama between people with poor communication.

    Nosy friend with it? Get ready for I’m coming by or what are you doing there texts.

    know some people who use it to pick up drunk friends just in case. For emergencies. Do they use it like her? Noooooooopeeeee

    Most people lack the maturity for this. It skeeves me the fuck out.