• Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    28 minutes ago

    I dont know why it upsets people. Maybe accept that it exists in the world and it only mimics real human creativity.

    If there was a fish that could mimic and recreate human art would you be mad at the fish?

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 days ago

    Bizarre AI-generated images are currently flooding Facebook, as engagement hacks and bots run rampant on the social media platform, spawning a meme-worthy image that has been dubbed “Shrimp Jesus.”

  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    I feel like it usually minionizes anything it touches anyways, so that’s a surprisingly good fit for it.

  • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Too bad the supreme court put the dagger in artists backs for AI already. It would have been great if a company would license an artists source material to make a set of variations for a limited venue. Like a company licensing a voice actor’s samples, then they get to use AI to make those characters say whatever they want, in that one movie, or that one game, based on the license.

    As it is now, we’re going to end up with Spruce Lee fighting Hackie Chan movies, and none of the actors or their estates will get to say shit about it.

    • DearOldGrandma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The youngest boomers are 64 still. We may be done working with them in 10 years or so but they’re stubborn. The ones still working then are the ones who never could win financially or are the ones who took advantage of everyone and never learned to stop.