• big_slap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      yes! it is a SERVICE Americans already pay for in taxes, the need to make a profit on it makes no sense.

        • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’d be very fine with it being tax funded instead of being funded by stamps and parcel metering. We might have much less shit mail as a result. It was an actual part of this government, not a corporation like now, before 1970, when the Reorg Act went into effect. Look before 1970 then USPS workers were not allowed to collectively bargain but that still could have been achieved with the a different outcome in 1970.

          I would be very fine with tax funding because as a service the work they do facilitates other sectors’ viabilities. There might also be more accountability to help the workers.

  • guldukat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    If most of that went to the driver I would be OK with it. I never use those services, they exploit workers

    • theangryseal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I only do when my daughter is staying somewhere and doesn’t have food to eat. That’s rare, but it has happened a few times.

  • dx1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    USPS is the most underappreciated thing in the world. In the shittiest areas I’ve ever lived it’s still been fairly reliable. In a nice area, forget about it, perfect.

  • Chris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    Look at that money on the table! Of course we should privatize the USPS!

    (/s of course)

  • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think that if food delivery was treated how my last postal package was treated, then all food would be arriving as a soup, or maybe as a goulash.

    • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      We don’t, unless it’s alot of food. So much food in fact that the equivalent sized package would cost more than $10.50 for USPS to take 3+ days to deliver.

      I love USPS but this whole thread makes people look like they’ve been huffing markers all afternoon.

    • Baphomet_The_Blasphemer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s all a racket here. The cost off the food is typically higher than the restaurants menu price, then there’s an upcharged service fee, separate delivery fee, and tip. So, by the time you’re done, you just paid double for that $12-15 item, and Uber eats is the worst of the bunch.

    • dx1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      See the giant bag? He’s got multiple orders in it.

      Not as efficient as driving to every mailbox in a row, to be sure.

      But it also doesn’t cost Uber probably more than 25% of what they charge for an order, to pay the delivery driver.