Currently, only GOG and Itch are still selling this game.

EDIT: It seems the game has returned to Humble Bundle.

  • Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    19 hours ago

    No place for challenging art in video games. Books and movies have been pushing boundaries for millennia, but this new medium is way too effective at affecting people

    -Valve, probably

    • Mark with a Z@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I guess you wouldn’t be wrong to say that sexual abuse of children is challenging and pushes boundaries.

      E: see replies.

        • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I’m on the fence about the topic, but you’ve gotta be dense to believe CSAM has nothing to do here. The accusation is one of CSAM, so the argument is whether the scene is CSAM or not.

          In a perfect world the question would be simple, but in the reality we live in, you have to consider if the art will be misused - and that’s assuming the artist is honest about their intentions in the first place.

          • Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 hours ago

            If that was true, why would the game removing fictional minors for a distinctly unsexual situation not remedy the rejection? Come on now

          • zqps@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            The distinction may seem like nitpicking but no, CSAM is a legally defined term of depictions of actual children being sexually abused.

            This game does not feature any such content. Not just because there are no depictions of real children, but also because the fictional children depicted aren’t subjected to sexual abuse.

            Valve’s language cites “sexual conduct” which in this case reportedly (I didn’t watch it myself) has been stretched to include nudity that is non-sexual in nature.

            I get why Valve would err on the side of caution, but that TOS decision is no basis to turn around and make the legally relevant claim that the game features actual CSAM.