The glory days of Epic Games are long gone and Tim Sweeney is a god damn moron.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    “Waaaahhhh! Waaaaahhhh! Why is Steam such a good service? That should be illegal! Tell them they should be worse!”

    That’s all I’m hearing from these other corpos.

  • Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Go ahead and remove it Tim, I already don’t spend money on your platform and I will just continue that.

    The closest I’ve come is when I bought Alan Wake 2 on my PS5.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Sweeney has Steam living rent free in his head. Whining about Monopoly

    Meanwhile, Epic Games already has something resembling a monopoly with the unreal engine, its buggy and resource hungry as fuck, and just seems to be getting worse. Necessitating an arms race of computer upgrades just to run the newest games on their obtuse engine thats being used for everything now. Epic certainly isnt doing anything about it. Its just a money printer for Tim’s legal battles.

  • termaxima@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    If that actually happens and the label becomes redundant, then we can talk about removing it.

    Or better, inverting it to a “No AI” label for the people like me who will still care.

    Tech bros always act like this : they don’t want to actually win by making a good solution. Instead they try to make you feel like their solution is inevitable and they have already won…

    For a group of people who claim to be all about meritocracy and the “marketplace of ideas”, they sure like to short circuit those whenever possible…

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Sigh.

    I swear, Epic would probably have a decent reputation (and storefront) if Sweeney would just shut his trap and delete all his social media.

  • zecg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It does make sense, because I’ll boycott nearly all future productions.

  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    18 hours ago

    If Sweeney can read this, I just want to tell him something. As someone who made games with ZZT as a kid and thought it was the best thing ever, you need to understand that no AI could make something like that, even if as a kid using copied and ‘inspired’ code from other games (and learned how to hexedit out the protections from other ZZT worlds so I can see how they worked) the cycle of just working through a rudimentary coding language was the reward in and of it self even if I never did finish the game I had in mind.

    BTW, that game just involved an adventurer in a kingdom that is being troubled by… Hitler’s ghost, and your objective was to send his ass back to hell. I found a boss fight in another ZZT world that I thought was too cool not to reuse for that purpose, too. But sadly it was never finished.

    That being said, we DO need ‘AI generated’ or ‘AI assisted’ as a tag. There isn’t anything weird or wrong with that. In online art spaces like deviant art you can tag stuff as ‘traditional’ art (meaning done on paper/canvas with whatever media you used, like pencils, various paints, etc) or digital or a combination thereof, like a hand drawn sketch that was completed and colored with photoshop. Why the fuck would anyone be against telling people what tools were used?

  • RaphaelSchmitz@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    He’s right IMHO.

    You can make hundreds of AI slop games in the time you can make one game that is a creative work of art.

    It would be waaay easier to police 100 games with a “No AI” label, than making sure 10000 slop games have a “Made by AI” label.

    Maybe you think something like “but the ratio SHOULD be the other way around”, but to that you honestly have to deal with the answer “should could woulda”.

    • MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      That’s not his argument, tho. He’s saying all games will be using the slop machine. And hopefully he’s wrong, but if not, there’s plenty of already-made games to go through.

  • apftwb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Sounds like Epic needs to try to make a online game store to compete with Steam, but filled with AI slopware.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I like how he’s basically admitting that it’s a negative that would hurt the game sales. Because consumers don’t want it.