• JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    1 month ago

    Ah. So now we’re merely ‘licensing’ physical hardware we paid for and have in our homes. right?

    • Adalast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      You always have with Nintendo products. They have always had very aggressive licensing practices. In the early days they were more flexing them on developers, but it does not surprise me that in the wake of everyone telling them that modding and emulators can be explicitly legal that they would turn that particularly litigious aspect of their family friendly brand on the customers.

  • ssillyssadass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 month ago

    At this point I’m surprised Nintendo still allows people to play their games at their own homes, and not exclusively in official Nintendo-branded Play Rooms that only exist in like 6 places outside Tokyo and costs $20/hr to rent.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 month ago

    At this point I want Switch 2 to flop so hard they go the way of the Sega and start licensing their IPs on other platforms, giving up on consoles. A shame, too, since their tech is little kid hand friendly and the PC market doesn’t seem keen on tiny screen handhelds.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 month ago

    Pretty sure that’s illegal in most parts of Europe. Checking the article it says that the policy has only been updated in the UK and the US.

    Sucks to be a country without adequate consumer protection, I guess.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Apparently Torzo exists already!

      Also knowing how butthurt Nintendo is rn it probably means Switch 2 is vulnerable to emulation so not that long probably.

  • Constant Pain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sony tried that in Brazil, but it didn’t go as planned. The court ordered them to unbrick it, but they had to provide a new console because they couldn’t unbrick it. And they paid damages.

  • kadup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    They can “reserve the right” all they want, that’s illegal where I live, and they sell their devices officially here. I’d love to see them trying to hold this stance in court - even Apple lost here over a similar issue, so go right ahead and try.

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh, you thought you owned that thing you bought? No. This is 2025. You own nothing. It doesn’t matter how much money you gave them. Yeah, gave them. Because you didn’t buy that stuff. You’re just borrowing it.

  • anarchyrabbit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    That’s cool. I’ll install Torzu on my ROG ally and play all the fucking switch games I want to.

  • mriswith@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Wait, it doesn’t appear to be the same within the EU.

    Both the French and German EULA seems to say that if you alter a digital product, the digital product might be rendered unusable. Although my French and German is bad, so someone please double check.

  • midori matcha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’d like to say their legalese is written in a way that covers more ground in the US, the most litigious country in the world. I would imagine if this was taken to court, their lawyers would argue that “permanently unusable in whole or in part” includes a console serial ban from NSO, or argue that it’s the user’s fault for bricking the console when they attempted to mod it, and Nintendo is therefore not liable or obligated to fix it.

    But between the UK-ToS and US-ToS, Nintendo just straight up tells Americans that they themselves are going to break your damn console if you do a thing they don’t like. That is absolutely dystopian.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    They’re going to start breaking them as soon as the switch 3 is released I guarantee it.

    Also this seems like I don’t know not theft Maybe, but some crime.