• doodledup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s in their best interest to suppress non-human conversations. What are you talking about?

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 month ago

      Is it? Reddit has been full of bots for years.

      And if the r/CMV thing didn’t make it apparently, the recent wave of them weren’t “caught in the act” and only became a “problem” when the researchers announced their shitty experiment.

      If realistic chat bots can fool the masses, why on earth would reddit get rid of them? It helps their metrics. “Look at how active our site is! Buy stock!”

      • doodledup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        I know you enjoy hating on Reddit but what you’re saying doesn’t make any sense. Reddit is an advertising business. Bots don’t view advertising but adds infrastructure cost. Additionally, humans are way better at engagement with the platform and people than bots.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 month ago

          Bot activity brings “engagement” which generated more page views from actual humans. Literally the only downside of this announcement is the optics of having bots in the first place.

          The bots were already indistinguishable from humans on reddit, do you really think that this recent scrutiny is going to lead to fewer bots? Or might it actually lead to better bots?