Kookie215@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · edit-24 days agoIf I snapped you back in time 650 years right this very second, how would you use your current knowledge to succeed?message-squaremessage-square79fedilinkarrow-up1120arrow-down15file-text
arrow-up1115arrow-down1message-squareIf I snapped you back in time 650 years right this very second, how would you use your current knowledge to succeed?Kookie215@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · edit-24 days agomessage-square79fedilinkfile-text
Its the 14th century and you’ve had no time to prepare, after you’re done reading this post you are snapped. What do you do?
minus-squareFuglyDuck@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoWikipedia is for my benefit, so I can just read it. Nobody else needs to even know I have it, necessarily. Them not being able to read it might even be a boon. The goal is to get a leg up on things, not start having nuclear reactors in the medieval era. For example muskets had an iterative development as small incremental changes took place. Relatively small changes made modest improvements. It would also be nice to know when eclipses are about to happen, for, ah, reasons.
Wikipedia is for my benefit, so I can just read it.
Nobody else needs to even know I have it, necessarily.
Them not being able to read it might even be a boon.
The goal is to get a leg up on things, not start having nuclear reactors in the medieval era.
For example muskets had an iterative development as small incremental changes took place. Relatively small changes made modest improvements.
It would also be nice to know when eclipses are about to happen, for, ah, reasons.