• gwilikers@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Do all these dickheads go to a school to learn the same specific hand gestures?

  • KenLin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 days ago

    I appreciate him saying it upfront. Makes it easy to stay away from all of their products.

  • calmnchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 days ago

    In other news, Perplexity has signed a deal with Motorola to have the browser preinstalled on their phones.

  • rpl6475@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    4 days ago

    Companies are so removed from what users want, they only focus on what shareholders want to hear and don’t consider that users will hate it.

      • MrNobody@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        So to ensure that a company is more likely to be customer focused, rather than shareholder focused, it’s likely a good idea to only go for companies not listed on the american stock exchanges?

        • Zacpod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yup. Same goes for being employed - if they’re publicly traded they’ll almost certainly treat their staff like absolute garbage.

        • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          I mean, that’s my take. Also why you hear a lot of moaning and groaning from enthusiasts when a company who makes well-loved products decides to go public. Enshittification always occurs.

      • fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Too bad, that long-term users still kind of decide the fate of the company (as shareholders at some point realize that their share probably is not worth it).

        I’m really keen to see when this happens to Tesla, I’m thinking about shorting the stock, it’s so vastly overvalued, and there’s strong competition and sales are crashing everywhere (because of too much Nazi)

        • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Too bad, that long-term users still kind of decide the fate of the company (as shareholders at some point realize that their share probably is not worth it).

          Yeah, that’s really the kicker, isn’t it? Legally beholden to the shareholders who demand short term profits forever and ever, risking the loss of long-term customers.

          It’s a guaranteed death.

  • cmrn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 days ago

    That’s like a cigarette brand marketing themselves as the most cancer-causing.

    • orgrinrt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Before even reading the article, I’m thinking they’re maybe selling it as a good thing along the lines of “do you hate to see those ads you don’t care about? Taking space on your apps and pages? What if there was a way to make them actually useful! Make them feel like content, just for you!”

      I feel like I have to point out that this is horrific either way

      Edit: I actually talked about this quickly with a few almost tech-illiterate friends and they were honestly excited about that at first, when I didn’t preface it with my reasoned disdain for it or the privacy implications… so despite the way we here react to it, I’m almost sure this will sell amazingly.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 days ago

    I would like for the people, who come up with these ideas, to dogfood their own product. Actually force them to try their own medicine. It would be a single digit percentage of acceptance then

    • madasi@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      You grossly underestimate how much some people truly love the idea of highly personalized ads. People who believe they are the best possible outcome and cannot fathom why anyone would have any problem with them at all. That’s who you are asking to dogfood this product, and they would and would find no issues with it.

  • postnataldrip@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    5 days ago

    Srinivas believes that Perplexity’s browser users will be fine with such tracking because the ads should be more relevant to them.

    Believes it, or is just spinning it that way?

    You could show me an ad for exactly what I want in that moment and I’d immediately not want it any more.

    Enough already.

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 days ago

      Perplexity is a free AI-powered answer engine that provides accurate, trusted, and real-time answers to any question.

      That’s not gonna be hard, fortunately.

  • Coyote_sly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    Can’t sell reams and reams of customer data if you don’t have any customers.

    tapforehead.jpg

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    These fuckers are just so delusional and out of touch with reality. Personalized ads my ass. We’ve been promised those for decades but pretty much all the ads I see on YouTube are from major retail chains with precisely zero relevance to me. They will show the ads of whoever pays for them. Your personal preferences are only relevant when it comes to targeting you with political propaganda.