• wolfinthewoods@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Ugh, so true. The insidious nature of Steam is the fact that they’re basically a PC gaming business monopoly, but they’re benign compared to other corporations, so gamers tend to turn a blind eye to that fact, or find various grasping ways to convince themselves otherwise (there’s still Epic and GOG! etc). The fact that 80%+ of PC game sales are through Steam doesn’t seem to faze or disturb them, when it most definitely should. What happens when Steam drops the facade? I imagine it won’t be long before Steam turns into the badguy.

    • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      There is a big difference when it’s a choice to use them. You aren’t forced or obligated, but people choose to. And they choose them for a reason, they do pretty good these days. People used to hate steam cause it was kinda shit when they first came out. I’m not saying there isn’t room for improvement, pretty much everything does. But it could be worse.

      I do fully agree, when Gaben steps down/passes I fully expect it to turn to typical gaming company fuckery.

    • Fatur_New@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The insidious nature of Steam is the fact that they’re basically a PC gaming business monopoly,

      Steam is a market leader, not a monopoly. Steam looks like a monopoly because it is the natural effect of being a market leader.

      The fact that 80%+ of PC game sales are through Steam doesn’t seem to faze or disturb them, when it most definitely should

      Reasonable disturbance but I personally will only categorize this as a concern.