Note that there still have been no studies on its efficacy. At worst, it is a great font to avoid ambiguity between characters.

    • go $fsck yourself@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      I find it ironic that their website has extremely low contrasting colors making it very hard to read.

      (Look at the top left for the worst example)

    • lol_idk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I find this harder to read than almost any other “normal” font. I wonder if I have some other reading impairment I’ve never been aware of - having recently discovered I’m also not neurotypical

    • snek_boi@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I actually changed my Anki to OpenDyslexic a couple of months ago! I changed it again when Atkinson Hyperlegible Next came out, but I agree that OpenDyslexic makes reading a breeze.

      My only grievance with OpenDyslexic is that I don’t think I could send reports with this font without pushback. On the other hand, I have sent multiple reports using Atkinson Hyperlegible and nobody has ever said a thing.

  • NONE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    I have been using this font as the default font on my personal laptop and I am more than happy with the way it looks and reads.

    • snek_boi@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      A couple of years ago I tried using the original Atkinson Hyperlegible (the one published a couple of years ago, before “Next”) on GNOME and my settings didn’t quite work. I had scaling at around 100% and increased the font size a little bit because I was having a hard time reading the font (the irony!). You inspired me to try again, but now with Atkinson Hyperlegible Next!

  • untorquer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think this actually has a negative effect for me. It’s like every character is now screaming for my attention, and my brain can’t read whole words and phrases. I have to process the letters first. Though it’s possible this could be more to do with the website’s rendering on mobile and default font size.

    • snek_boi@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s interesting. I’d love to know if you have the same experience on a desktop and with different font sizes.

      • untorquer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        It’s just the font size. I have to zoom out to 50% then it’s pretty comfortable. But also I’m not the target audience and if my eyesight goes later on in life I’ll probably benefit. I’m glad sites are considering things like this for accessibility.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    As someone that has pretty decent vision, I enjoyed reading this font very much. Imma have to download it just because it’s pleasant to read.

  • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I have good vision but I actually really like this font since i have a smaller phone screen! Anyone know how to install it on an Android phone?

  • Mattster_Of_Puppets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Would I be able to add this to my Kobo e-reader?

    I wear glasses - but read in bed without them. I have a larger font size set - but thus looks like a clearer font too

  • ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is probably a stupid question. If it is free for personal and all commercial use… which case isn’t covered by that? Could just say it is free to use.

    • NONE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      OP just tries to be as clear and transparent as possible, because there are times when someone says something is “free to use” but then in the “fine print” they hide limitations.

      • ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s actually on their page, so I didn’t try to call out OP on that (and not saying you implied that, just to be sure) but am actually curious if that means something specific.

  • Yingwu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I used it for a bit on my e-reader but decided to switch away from it. It’s quite good either way.