Stamets@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 2 months agoI mean... I don't see the problem?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square21linkfedilinkarrow-up1308arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up1302arrow-down1imageI mean... I don't see the problem?lemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to memes@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square21linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareTheButter_ItSeeps@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 months agoThey could each be on the vertices of a tetrahedron for all we know…
minus-squareMistic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoI was thinking of plane surfaces, but if their altitudes are different, I guess it’d be possible.
minus-squarekryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoYes, it is possible with a 3-sided pyramid, i.e. tetrahedron. If we dont look at all 4 points as being on the same plane but 2 opposite corners being offset above or below the other two, this could totally be a tatrahedron.
Pyramid?
Wdym?
They could each be on the vertices of a tetrahedron for all we know…
I was thinking of plane surfaces, but if their altitudes are different, I guess it’d be possible.
Yes, it is possible with a 3-sided pyramid, i.e. tetrahedron. If we dont look at all 4 points as being on the same plane but 2 opposite corners being offset above or below the other two, this could totally be a tatrahedron.