Fools!
…limiting themselves to Euclidean geometry…Saddle shaped universe confirmed
No one said right angles.
Equal sides in a triangle are only possible if the corners are equal. So, 60⁰ each.
But its height cannot be half of base because of the same Pythagorean theorem
(1,5)²+(1,5/2)²=2,8125
sqrt(2,8125) ≈ 1,677, which is half of a diagonal
So, we get 4 sides that are 1,5 in a parallelogram, but diagonals are 1,5 and 3,354, as opposed to both being 1,5 as shown on the picture
TL;DR: Won’t work because Pythagorean theorem
Pyramid?
Yes, it is possible with a 3-sided pyramid, i.e. tetrahedron. If we dont look at all 4 points as being on the same plane but 2 opposite corners being offset above or below the other two, this could totally be a tatrahedron.
Wdym?
They could each be on the vertices of a tetrahedron for all we know…
I was thinking of plane surfaces, but if their altitudes are different, I guess it’d be possible.
Tetrahedrons man, tetrahedrons.
Well you see, space isn’t flat in this very localized area!
Middle one should be the square root of 4.5 meters, or 2.12 meters
What? Everytime I meet other people we always arange ourselves in the shape of a simplex of the appropriate dimension. Doesn’t everyone?
So the fifth person to arrive moves to the centre of the tetrahedron and shifts roughly 1.299m into the past or future.
I have a few questions.
- How do you attain time offset?
- Doesn’t that make conversation difficult?
- What even is the fifth dimension?
- How do you convert a distance in metres into a distance in time? You would surely then have a universal m/s? Oh, wait, there is a universal speed, it’s the speed of light, which means 1.299m is equivalent to about 4.3 billionths of a second, which is considerably less impressive for question 1 and just not at all problematic for question 2.
- If you’re using very fast motion for your time offset, doesn’t that make conversation even more difficult? How fast would you need to be going to dilate time for a few billionths of a second? Doesn’t Heisenberg uncertainty start to have an impact here? How can you be sure you got it right?
If you have to ask, you wouldn’t understand.
If I understood, I wouldn’t have to ask.
Thank you
Explanation:
So, Theres the sentence of Pythagoras. It says that c2 = a2 + b2 when the triangle has a 90° corner
Since a square is just 2 triangles, it applies. That means c (the distance from Person a to Person c) should be √(2×1.902). But that is 2.7m.
These instructions are in 3d.
Even if we would take it from the head of person a to the toe of c, its still a triangle
It’s the plan view of 4 equilateral triangles arranged into a tetrahedron. There are no right angles so Pythagoras doesn’t apply.
