• Grimtuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    10 days ago

    Then it’s not engagement. We have to stop this nonsense.

    Also, we need laws making bots that pretend to be real users illegal. We’re heading for some black mirror shit otherwise.

    • thehatfox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      10 days ago

      The platform owners don’t consider engagement to me be participation in meaningful discourse. Engagement to them just means staying on the platform while seeing ads.

      If bots keep people doing that those platforms will keep letting them in.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        Which is a good argument for regulation. Regulation prevents industry from doing things that may be in their individual best interest but are against public best interests or the best interests of the industry as a whole.

  • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    10 days ago

    Exactly what the big platforms want, and exactly what’s different about Lemmy. Low-volume, high-quality interactions

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 days ago

      You realize that the only reason Lemmy hasn’t become so enshitified is because the user base is too small for the corpos to seriously target it yet. The day Lemmy has more than a million users the army of bots will not be too far behind.

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        That will be only possible, if said companies will create their own instances, maybe even with ad support. Without that, all we gonna see is some corporations running said bots to promote their products. Just wait until someone is looking to but XY, then answer it with some semi-personalized with AI text to promote your own products. This can already happen with human-run accounts, but I’d choose some small business owner stumbling on Lemmy over a bot that AI generates me a response.

      • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 days ago

        At least they’ll never find a complicit management. Still it doesn’t matter, I’m going to enjoy this space while it’s nice :)

      • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        Idk man, back in November the place was pretty enshitified. Not sure if it was just left wing nut jobs but anybody with a political position even close to center or right got about 100 downvotes and got called a Russian troll or worse.

        Since then it’s been a lot better though.

  • Narri N.@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 days ago

    No fucking shit, Sherlock. In other news: “water is wet” and “fire is hot”, and later “capitalism does nothing for non-capitalists, and should be overthrown”

  • Yggstyle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    I think the phrase they are seeking is signal to noise. The bots make noise but bury the signal making it harder to actually find and communicate with others who are actually engaging. Weird how that works.